Literature DB >> 17376710

Articular damage caused by metal plugs in a rabbit model for treatment of localized cartilage defects.

R J H Custers1, W J A Dhert, M H P van Rijen, A J Verbout, L B Creemers, D B F Saris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Currently, the surgical treatment of localized cartilage defects has limitations. Alternatively, localized cartilage defects may be treated with small biocompatible metal cartilage tacks. Our purpose was to investigate the applicability of defect-size femoral implants. Different bearing materials, cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and oxidized zirconium (OxZr), were tested to evaluate the effect on opposing cartilage quality and osseointegration at different insertion depths.
METHODS: In 18 adult female New Zealand White rabbits, a medial femoral condyle defect was filled with either an OxZr or a CoCr implant (Ø articulating surface 3.5 mm; fixating pin of 9.1 mm length), placed flush, 1mm deep or 1mm protruding with respect to the level of the surrounding cartilage. Animals were sacrificed after 4 weeks. Tibial cartilage quality was scored microscopically and osseointegration measured by automated histomorphometry.
RESULTS: Considerable articulating cartilage erosion was found in all conditions. Tibial cartilage quality was least compromised when both implants were placed flush compared to deep (P=0.01) or protruding position (P=0.004) and was better for OxZr compared to CoCr (P=0.011) when left protruding, while no differences were found when placed deep of flush. Most bone formation around the fixating pin was observed in a protruding position (P=0.01). In deep position, more bone-implant contact was observed with CoCr compared to OxZr (P=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: OxZr and CoCr implants showed good osseointegration when used as a localized cartilage defect treatment in the rabbit knee; however, opposite cartilage damage was observed in all cases. Placement flush to the surrounding cartilage seems essential and when left protruding OxZr may be less erosive. In conclusion, caution is warranted using small metal implants for the treatment of localized cartilage in the human patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17376710     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  9 in total

Review 1.  Toward improved clinical relevance of cartilage insult models in the rabbit knee: surgical access to the habitual weight-bearing region.

Authors:  Yuki Tochigi; Joseph A Buckwalter; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

2.  Effect of implantation accuracy on ankle contact mechanics with a metallic focal resurfacing implant.

Authors:  Donald D Anderson; Yuki Tochigi; M James Rudert; Tanawat Vaseenon; Thomas D Brown; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  The subchondral bone in articular cartilage repair: current problems in the surgical management.

Authors:  Andreas H Gomoll; Henning Madry; Gunnar Knutsen; Niek van Dijk; Romain Seil; Mats Brittberg; Elizaveta Kon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Novel metallic implantation technique for osteochondral defects of the medial talar dome. A cadaver study.

Authors:  Christiaan J A van Bergen; Maartje Zengerink; Leendert Blankevoort; Maayke N van Sterkenburg; Jakob van Oldenrijk; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Biological and functional evaluation of a novel pyrolytic carbon implant for the treatment of focal osteochondral defects in the medial femoral condyle: assessment in a canine model.

Authors:  Samantha L Salkeld; Laura P Patron; Joan C Lien; Stephen D Cook; Deryk G Jones
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Effects of focal metallic implants on opposing cartilage - an in-vitro study with an abrasion test machine.

Authors:  Theresa Diermeier; Arne Venjakob; Kevin Byrne; Rainer Burgkart; Peter Foehr; Stefan Milz; Andreas B Imhoff; Stephan Vogt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Ultrasound-Based Quantification of Cartilage Damage After In Vivo Articulation With Metal Implants.

Authors:  Maria Pastrama; Janne Spierings; Pieter van Hugten; Keita Ito; Richard Lopata; Corrinus C van Donkelaar
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Arthroscopic fixation of cell free polymer-based cartilage implants with a bioinspired polymer surface on the hip joint: a cadaveric pilot study.

Authors:  Matthias Lahner; Christian Duif; Andreas Ficklscherer; Christian Kaps; Lukas Kalwa; Tobias Seidl
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Simple geometry tribological study of osteochondral graft implantation in the knee.

Authors:  Philippa Bowland; Eileen Ingham; John Fisher; Louise M Jennings
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 1.617

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.