Literature DB >> 17376252

Clinical comparison of remifentanil-sevoflurane vs. remifentanil-propofol for endoscopic endonasal transphenoidal surgery.

T Cafiero1, L M Cavallo, A Frangiosa, R Burrelli, G Gargiulo, P Cappabianca, E de Divitiis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic endonasal transphenoidal surgery has been recently proposed as a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of pituitary adenomas. The main objective of the anaesthesiologist is to induce sufficient haemodynamic control together with rapid recovery at the end of surgery. The aim of this study was to examine recovery profile, surgical operative conditions and haemodynamic differences using remifentanil infusion with either propofol target controlled infusion system or sevoflurane.
METHOD: Forty-four adult patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-group study: Group P received propofol target controlled infusion system and remifentanil; Group S received sevoflurane and remifentanil for maintenance of anaesthesia.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between the two groups with regards to the haemodynamic changes, operative conditions as assessed by a four-step bleeding score (0-3), were obtained. Recovery times were considerably shorter after remifentanil-sevoflurane in comparison with remifentanil-propofol target controlled infusion system group (7.4 vs. 12.8 min, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that sevoflurane-remifentanil gives a faster recovery and equivalent intraoperative status compared with propofol target controlled infusion system with remifentanil for the endoscopic endonasal transphenoidal approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17376252     DOI: 10.1017/S0265021506002080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Recovery Profile and Patient Satisfaction After Ambulatory Anesthesia for Dental Treatment-A Crossover Comparison Between Propofol and Sevoflurane.

Authors:  Keita Ohkushi; Ken-Ichi Fukuda; Yoshihiko Koukita; Yuzuru Kaneko; Tatsuya Ichinohe
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2016

2.  Total intravenous versus inhaled anesthesia in transsphenoidal tumor surgery.

Authors:  Suneeta Gollapudy; David M Poetker; Jasmeet Sidhu; Matthias L Riess
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  Skull Base Approaches for Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas: Institutional Experience in a Series of 34 Patients.

Authors:  Shamsul Alam; Gianluca Ferini; Nur Muhammad; Nazmin Ahmed; Abu Naim Mohammad Wakil; Kazi Mohammad Atiqul Islam; Mohammad Samsul Arifin; Abdullah Al Mahbub; Riad Habib; Mosiur Rahman Mojumder; Atul Vats; Bipin Chaurasia
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  Comparison of the effects of inhalational and total intravenous anesthesia on quality of recovery in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Do-Hyeong Kim; Kyeong Tae Min; Eui Hyun Kim; Young Seo Choi; Seung Ho Choi
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.642

5.  Effects of three different types of anaesthesia on perioperative bleeding control in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Jarosław Miłoński; Hanna Zielińska-Bliźniewska; Wojciech Golusiński; Joanna Urbaniak; Rafał Sobański; Jurek Olszewski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Impact of Controlled Induced Hypotension on Cognitive Functions of Patients Undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Authors:  Stanislaw Nowak; Anna Ołdak; Anna Kluzik; Leon Drobnik
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-03-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.