Literature DB >> 17375286

Strong mutagenic effects of diesel engine emissions using vegetable oil as fuel.

Jürgen Bünger1, Jürgen Krahl, Axel Munack, Yvonne Ruschel, Olaf Schröder, Birgit Emmert, Götz Westphal, Michael Müller, Ernst Hallier, Thomas Brüning.   

Abstract

Diesel engine emissions (DEE) are classified as probably carcinogenic to humans. In recent years every effort was made to reduce DEE and their content of carcinogenic and mutagenic polycyclic aromatic compounds. Since 1995 we observed an appreciable reduction of mutagenicity of DEE driven by reformulated or newly designed fuels in several studies. Recently, the use of rapeseed oil as fuel for diesel engines is rapidly growing among German transportation businesses and agriculture due to economic reasons. We compared the mutagenic effects of DEE from two different batches of rapeseed oil (RSO) with rapeseed methyl ester (RME, biodiesel), natural gas derived synthetic fuel (gas-to-liquid, GTL), and a reference diesel fuel (DF). The test engine was a heavy-duty truck diesel running the European Stationary Cycle. Particulate matter from the exhaust was sampled onto PTFE-coated glass fibre filters and extracted with dichloromethane in a soxhlet apparatus. The gas phase constituents were sampled as condensates. The mutagenicity of the particle extracts and the condensates was tested using the Salmonella typhimurium/mammalian microsome assay with tester strains TA98 and TA100. Compared to DF the two RSO qualities significantly increased the mutagenic effects of the particle extracts by factors of 9.7 up to 59 in tester strain TA98 and of 5.4 up to 22.3 in tester strain TA100, respectively. The condensates of the RSO fuels caused an up to factor 13.5 stronger mutagenicity than the reference fuel. RME extracts had a moderate but significant higher mutagenic response in assays of TA98 with metabolic activation and TA100 without metabolic activation. GTL samples did not differ significantly from DF. In conclusion, the strong increase of mutagenicity using RSO as diesel fuel compared to the reference DF and other fuels causes deep concern on future usage of this biologic resource as a replacement of established diesel fuels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17375286     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-007-0196-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  11 in total

1.  Comparative cardiopulmonary toxicity of exhausts from soy-based biofuels and diesel in healthy and hypertensive rats.

Authors:  Virginia L Bass; Mette C Schladweiler; Abraham Nyska; Ronald F Thomas; Desinia B Miller; Todd Krantz; Charly King; M Ian Gilmour; Allen D Ledbetter; Judy E Richards; Urmila P Kodavanti
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Biodiesel versus diesel exposure: enhanced pulmonary inflammation, oxidative stress, and differential morphological changes in the mouse lung.

Authors:  Naveena Yanamala; Meghan K Hatfield; Mariana T Farcas; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Jon A Hummer; Michael R Shurin; M Eileen Birch; Dmitriy W Gutkin; Elena Kisin; Valerian E Kagan; Aleksandar D Bugarski; Anna A Shvedova
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Abnormalities in the male reproductive system after exposure to diesel and biodiesel blend.

Authors:  Elena R Kisin; Naveena Yanamala; Mariana T Farcas; Dmitriy W Gutkin; Michael R Shurin; Valerian E Kagan; Aleksandar D Bugarski; Anna A Shvedova
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Temperature and Driving Cycle Significantly Affect Carbonaceous Gas and Particle Matter Emissions from Diesel Trucks.

Authors:  Michael D Hays; William Preston; Barbara J George; Ingrid J George; Richard Snow; James Faircloth; Thomas Long; Richard W Baldauf; Joseph McDonald
Journal:  Energy Fuels       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  Effect of biodiesel on PAH, OPAH, and NPAH emissions from a direct injection diesel engine.

Authors:  Xinling Li; Ye Zheng; Chun Guan; Chun Shun Cheung; Zhen Huang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Potential hazards associated with combustion of bio-derived versus petroleum-derived diesel fuel.

Authors:  Jürgen Bünger; Jürgen Krahl; Olaf Schröder; Lasse Schmidt; Götz A Westphal
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.635

7.  Toxicological properties of emission particles from heavy duty engines powered by conventional and bio-based diesel fuels and compressed natural gas.

Authors:  Pasi I Jalava; Päivi Aakko-Saksa; Timo Murtonen; Mikko S Happo; Ari Markkanen; Pasi Yli-Pirilä; Pasi Hakulinen; Risto Hillamo; Jorma Mäki-Paakkanen; Raimo O Salonen; Jorma Jokiniemi; Maija-Riitta Hirvonen
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 9.400

8.  Mutagenicity of biodiesel or diesel exhaust particles and the effect of engine operating conditions.

Authors:  Elena R Kisin; X C Shi; Michael J Keane; Aleksandar B Bugarski; Anna A Shvedova
Journal:  J Environ Eng Ecol Sci       Date:  2013-03-09

Review 9.  Particulate matter beyond mass: recent health evidence on the role of fractions, chemical constituents and sources of emission.

Authors:  Flemming R Cassee; Marie-Eve Héroux; Miriam E Gerlofs-Nijland; Frank J Kelly
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  A comparative analysis of in vitro toxicity of diesel exhaust particles from combustion of 1st- and 2nd-generation biodiesel fuels in relation to their physicochemical properties-the FuelHealth project.

Authors:  Anna Lankoff; Kamil Brzoska; Joanna Czarnocka; Magdalena Kowalska; Halina Lisowska; Remigiusz Mruk; Johan Øvrevik; Aneta Wegierek-Ciuk; Mariusz Zuberek; Marcin Kruszewski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.