Literature DB >> 17375001

Intranasal administration of dry powder anthrax vaccine provides protection against lethal aerosol spore challenge.

Joanne Huang1, John A Mikszta, Matthew S Ferriter, Ge Jiang, Noel G Harvey, Beverly Dyas, Chad J Roy, Robert G Ulrich, Vincent J Sullivan.   

Abstract

The use of an aerosolizable form of anthrax as a biological weapon is considered to be among the most serious bioterror threats. Intranasal (IN) delivery of a dry powder anthrax vaccine could provide an effective and non-invasive administration alternative to traditional intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous (SC) injection. We evaluated a dry powder vaccine based on the recombinant Protective Antigen (rPA) of Bacillus anthracis for vaccination against anthrax via IN immunization in a rabbit model. rPA powders were formulated and administered IN using a prototype powder delivery device. We compared serum IgG and toxin neutralizing antibody (TNA) titers of rabbits immunized IN with 10 microg rPA of a powder formulation with those immunized with the same dose of liquid rPA vaccine, delivered either IN or by IM injection. In addition, each group was tested for survival after aerosol spore challenge. Our results showed that IN vaccination with rPA powders elicited serum PA-specific IgG and TNA titers that were equivalent to those raised by liquid rPA administered IN. Serum PA-specific IgG and TNA titers after IN delivery were lower than for IM injection, however, after aerosol spore challenge, rabbits immunized IN with powders displayed 100% protection versus 63% for the group immunized IN with the liquid vaccine and 86% for the group immunized by IM injection. The results suggest that an IN powder vaccine based on rPA is at least as protective as a liquid delivered by IM injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17375001     DOI: 10.4161/hv.3.3.4011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin        ISSN: 1554-8600


  15 in total

1.  Effective induction of protective systemic immunity with nasally administered vaccines adjuvanted with IL-1.

Authors:  William M Gwinn; Shaun M Kirwan; Sheena H Wang; Kathleen A Ashcraft; Neil L Sparks; Catherine R Doil; Tom G Tlusty; Leslie S Casey; Susan K Hollingshead; David E Briles; Richard S Dondero; Anthony J Hickey; W Michael Foster; Herman F Staats
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  Effect of vaccine administration modality on immunogenicity and efficacy.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Wei Wang; Shixia Wang
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.217

3.  Successful respiratory immunization with dry powder live-attenuated measles virus vaccine in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Wen-Hsuan Lin; Diane E Griffin; Paul A Rota; Mark Papania; Stephen P Cape; David Bennett; Brian Quinn; Robert E Sievers; Charles Shermer; Kenneth Powell; Robert J Adams; Steven Godin; Scott Winston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Generation and characterization of large-particle aerosols using a center flow tangential aerosol generator with a non-human-primate, head-only aerosol chamber.

Authors:  J Kyle Bohannon; Matthew G Lackemeyer; Jens H Kuhn; Jiro Wada; Laura Bollinger; Peter B Jahrling; Reed F Johnson
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 5.  Advances in device and formulation technologies for pulmonary drug delivery.

Authors:  John Gar Yan Chan; Jennifer Wong; Qi Tony Zhou; Sharon Shui Yee Leung; Hak-Kim Chan
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 6.  Intranasal immunization with dry powder vaccines.

Authors:  Tania F Bahamondez-Canas; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.571

7.  A single immunization with a dry powder anthrax vaccine protects rabbits against lethal aerosol challenge.

Authors:  S D Klas; C R Petrie; S J Warwood; M S Williams; C L Olds; J P Stenz; A M Cheff; M Hinchcliffe; C Richardson; S Wimer
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  A comparison of non-toxin vaccine adjuvants for their ability to enhance the immunogenicity of nasally-administered anthrax recombinant protective antigen.

Authors:  William M Gwinn; Brandi T Johnson; Shaun M Kirwan; Ashley E Sobel; Soman N Abraham; Michael D Gunn; Herman F Staats
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Protective immunity in mice achieved with dry powder formulation and alternative delivery of plague F1-V vaccine.

Authors:  Joanne Huang; Ajit J D'Souza; Jason B Alarcon; John A Mikszta; Brandi M Ford; Matthew S Ferriter; Michelle Evans; Todd Stewart; Kei Amemiya; Robert G Ulrich; Vincent J Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2009-03-04

10.  An adenovirus-vectored nasal vaccine confers rapid and sustained protection against anthrax in a single-dose regimen.

Authors:  Jianfeng Zhang; Edward Jex; Tsungwei Feng; Gloria S Sivko; Leslie W Baillie; Stanley Goldman; Kent R Van Kampen; De-chu C Tang
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.