Literature DB >> 17374862

Pitfalls in multi-detector row CT colonography: a systematic approach.

Thomas Mang1, Andrea Maier, Christina Plank, Christina Mueller-Mang, Christian Herold, Wolfgang Schima.   

Abstract

Thin-section multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) colonography is a powerful tool for the detection and classification of colonic lesions. However, each step in the process of a CT colonographic examination carries the potential for misdiagnosis. Suboptimal patient preparation, CT scanning protocol deficiencies, and perception and interpretation errors can lead to false-positive and false-negative findings, adversely affecting the diagnostic performance of CT colonography. These problems and pitfalls can be overcome with a variety of useful techniques and observations. A relatively clean, dry, and well-distended colon can be achieved with careful patient preparation, thereby avoiding the problem of residual stool and fluid. Knowledge of the morphologic and attenuation characteristics of common colonic lesions and artifacts can help identify bulbous haustral folds, impacted diverticula, an inverted appendiceal stump, or mobile polyps, any of which may pose problems for the radiologist. A combined two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging approach is recommended for each colonic finding. A thorough knowledge of the various pitfalls and pseudolesions that may be encountered at CT colonography, along with use of dedicated problem-solving techniques, will help the radiologist differentiate between definite colonic lesions and pseudolesions. (c) RSNA, 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17374862     DOI: 10.1148/rg.272065081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  13 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of translucency rendering to differentiate polyps from pseudopolyps at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a feasibility study.

Authors:  A Guerrisi; D Marin; A Laghi; M Di Martino; F Iafrate; R Iannaccone; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  [CT colonography: pathologic findings and pitfalls].

Authors:  T Mang; A Graser; A Maier; C Mueller-Mang; G Böhm; W Schima
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Computer-based self-training for CT colonography with and without CAD.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Silvia Delsanto; Daniela Sacchetto; Loredana Correale; Massimo Falchini; Andrea Ferraris; Giovanni Gandini; Giulia Grazzini; Franco Iafrate; Gabriella Iussich; Lia Morra; Andrea Laghi; Mario Mascalchi; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Multimodality Imaging Review of Anorectal and Perirectal Diseases With Histological, Endoscopic, and Operative Correlation, Part I: Anatomy and Neoplasms.

Authors:  Guillermo P Sangster; David H Ballard; Miguel Nazar; Richard Tsai; Maren Donato; Horacio B D'Agostino
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2018-07-29

5.  Ascending colon rotation following patient positional change during CT colonography: a potential pitfall in interpretation.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Seong Ho Park; Seung Soo Lee; Ah Young Kim; Hyun Kwon Ha
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Evaluation of image quality and lesion perception by human readers on 3D CT colonography: comparison of standard and low radiation dose.

Authors:  Valeria A Fisichella; Magnus Båth; Ase Allansdotter Johnsson; Fredrik Jäderling; Tommy Bergsten; Ulf Persson; Kristin Mellingen; Mikael Hellström
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Colovesical fistula causing an uncommon reason for failure of computed tomography colonography: a case report.

Authors:  Angeliki Neroladaki; Romain Breguet; Diomidis Botsikas; Sylvain Terraz; Christoph D Becker; Xavier Montet
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2012-07-23

8.  Computed tomographic colonography in preoperative evaluation of colorectal tumors: a prospective study.

Authors:  Krzysztof Leksowski; Malgorzata Rudzinska; Janusz Rudzinski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Computed tomography colonography - reasons for different and false results.

Authors:  Małgorzata Rudzińska; Janusz Rudziński; Krzysztof Leksowski
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2010-07

10.  Computed tomography colonography: a well-known but poorly utilized screening method.

Authors:  Antonio Carlos Maciel; Luciano Carone Maciel
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2014 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.