Literature DB >> 17374835

Dietary fat and postmenopausal invasive breast cancer in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort.

Anne C M Thiébaut1, Victor Kipnis, Shih-Chen Chang, Amy F Subar, Frances E Thompson, Philip S Rosenberg, Albert R Hollenbeck, Michael Leitzmann, Arthur Schatzkin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although ecologic association and animal studies support a direct effect of dietary fat on the development of breast cancer, results of epidemiologic studies have been inconclusive.
METHODS: We prospectively analyzed the association between fat consumption and the incidence of postmenopausal invasive breast cancer in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study, a US cohort comprising 188,736 postmenopausal women who completed a 124-item food-frequency questionnaire in 1995-1996. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models with adjustment for energy and potential confounding factors. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Over an average follow-up of 4.4 years, the cohort yielded 3501 cases of invasive breast cancer. The hazard ratio of breast cancer for the highest (median intake, 40.1% energy from total fat; 434 cases per 100,000 person-years) versus the lowest (median intake, 20.3% energy from total fat; 392 cases per 100,000 person-years) quintile of total fat intake was 1.11 (95% CI = 1.00 to 1.24; P(trend) = .017). The corresponding hazard ratio for a twofold increase in percent energy from total fat on the continuous scale was 1.15 (95% CI = 1.05 to 1.26). Positive associations were also found for subtypes of fat (hazard ratio for a twofold increase in percent energy from saturated fat = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.22; from monounsaturated fat, HR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.21; from polyunsaturated fat, HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.20). Correction for measurement error in nutrient intakes, on the basis of a calibration substudy that used two 24-hour dietary recalls, strengthened the associations, yielding an estimated hazard ratio for total fat of 1.32 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.58). Secondary analyses showed that associations between total, saturated, and monounsaturated fat intakes were confined to women who were not using menopausal hormone therapy at baseline.
CONCLUSION: In this large prospective cohort with a wide range of fat intake, dietary fat intake was directly associated with the risk of postmenopausal invasive breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17374835     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djk094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  56 in total

1.  Dietary fat and breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to ethnicity and hormone receptor status: the Multiethnic Cohort Study.

Authors:  Song-Yi Park; Laurence N Kolonel; Brian E Henderson; Lynne R Wilkens
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  Macronutrient composition influence on breast cancer risk in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women: the 4-Corners Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Maureen A Murtaugh; Jennifer Herrick; Carol Sweeney; Anna Guiliano; Kathy Baumgartner; Tim Byers; Martha Slattery
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.900

3.  Using regression calibration equations that combine self-reported intake and biomarker measures to obtain unbiased estimates and more powerful tests of dietary associations.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Douglas Midthune; Raymond J Carroll; Nataŝa Tasevska; Arthur Schatzkin; Julie Mares; Lesley Tinker; Nancy Potischman; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Regression calibration in nutritional epidemiology: example of fat density and total energy in relationship to postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Ross L Prentice; Mary Pettinger; Lesley F Tinker; Ying Huang; Cynthia A Thomson; Karen C Johnson; Jeannette Beasley; Garnet Anderson; James M Shikany; Rowan T Chlebowski; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Role of HGF in obesity-associated tumorigenesis: C3(1)-TAg mice as a model for human basal-like breast cancer.

Authors:  Sneha Sundaram; Alex J Freemerman; Amy R Johnson; J Justin Milner; Kirk K McNaughton; Joseph A Galanko; Katharine M Bendt; David B Darr; Charles M Perou; Melissa A Troester; Liza Makowski
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Dietary fatty acids and pancreatic cancer in the NIH-AARP diet and health study.

Authors:  Anne C M Thiébaut; Li Jiao; Debra T Silverman; Amanda J Cross; Frances E Thompson; Amy F Subar; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Dealing with dietary measurement error in nutritional cohort studies.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Arthur Schatzkin; Douglas Midthune; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Disparity in cancer prevention and screening in aboriginal populations: recommendations for action.

Authors:  S Ahmed; R K Shahid; J A Episkenew
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Dietary fat, fatty acids, and risk of prostate cancer in the NIH-AARP diet and health study.

Authors:  Colleen Pelser; Alison M Mondul; Albert R Hollenbeck; Yikyung Park
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Soy food supplementation, dietary fat reduction and peripheral blood gene expression in postmenopausal women--a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Kimberly Siegmund; Chiu-Cheng Tseng; Amy S Lee; Anna H Wu
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.