OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of the serology test kit (Signify H. pylori test), an office-based serological test and to compare relative performances with endoscopy, including biopsy urease tests (Clotest), histology, and culture when applied to dyspeptic adult patients in Hong Kong Chinese. METHODS: Prospective clinical trial was conducted at the Alice Ho Miu ling Nethersole Hospital (AHNH) outpatient endoscopy center from June to December 2004 and included adult Chinese patients who attended the endoscopy center. A research nurse interviewed consenting patients and whole blood samples were obtained via simple fingerstick were then and transferred to Signify test kits. The results were read after 5 minutes. The presence of two distinct lines within the result-reading window was treated as a positive result; a single distinct line was treated as a negative result. All patients underwent upper gastroduodenal endoscopy, and antral/antrum gastric biopsy specimens were taken and then processed for microbiological cultures. RESULTS: A total of 384 patients were recruited in the study and 131 (34.7%) patients were tested positive for H. pylori. Among them, 62 patients (47.3%) were detected by the Signify H. pylori test. The Signify serology test kit was 52.7% sensitive, 87.9% specific, and 75.7% accurate, respectively in the current study. CONCLUSION: The Signify H. pylori test showed a sub-optimal correlation between the presence of H. pylori infection and the serological test results in a Hong Kong Chinese population.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of the serology test kit (Signify H. pylori test), an office-based serological test and to compare relative performances with endoscopy, including biopsy urease tests (Clotest), histology, and culture when applied to dyspeptic adultpatients in Hong Kong Chinese. METHODS: Prospective clinical trial was conducted at the Alice Ho Miu ling Nethersole Hospital (AHNH) outpatient endoscopy center from June to December 2004 and included adult Chinese patients who attended the endoscopy center. A research nurse interviewed consenting patients and whole blood samples were obtained via simple fingerstick were then and transferred to Signify test kits. The results were read after 5 minutes. The presence of two distinct lines within the result-reading window was treated as a positive result; a single distinct line was treated as a negative result. All patients underwent upper gastroduodenal endoscopy, and antral/antrum gastric biopsy specimens were taken and then processed for microbiological cultures. RESULTS: A total of 384 patients were recruited in the study and 131 (34.7%) patients were tested positive for H. pylori. Among them, 62 patients (47.3%) were detected by the Signify H. pylori test. The Signify serology test kit was 52.7% sensitive, 87.9% specific, and 75.7% accurate, respectively in the current study. CONCLUSION: The Signify H. pylori test showed a sub-optimal correlation between the presence of H. pyloriinfection and the serological test results in a Hong Kong Chinese population.
Authors: R Dhar; A S Mustafa; P M Dhar; M S Khan; F J al-Rashidi; A A al-Shamali; F H Ali Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 2.803
Authors: Wai Man Wong; Shiu Kum Lam; Harry H X Xia; Vera Sy Tang; Kam Chuen Lai; Wayne H C Hu; Chi Kuen Chan; Kwan Lok Cheung; Benjamin C Y Wong Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.029