Literature DB >> 17372749

New parameter of flexion after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: posterior condylar offset ratio on X-ray photographs.

Yoshinori Soda1, Jiro Oishi, Tomoyuki Nakasa, Koichiro Nishikawa, Mitsuo Ochi.   

Abstract

In cruciate-retaining (CR) type TKA, the increase in posterior condylar offset (PCO) is considered to be correlated to flexion angle acquired postoperatively according to the article reported by Bellemans (J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:50-53, 2002). However, the significance of PCO seems to differ according to the size of joints. We therefore have defined a new parameter of posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) on the lateral view of plain X-ray photographs and studied the relationship between PCOR and postoperative flexion status in posterior-stabilized (PS) type TKA. Flexion status includes two parameters, such as postoperative flexion angle (FA) and flexion achievement rate (AR). The subjects of this study were 160 knees (16 males and 144 females, average 75 years.) with PS type TKA for osteoarthritic knees between 1999 and 2003 at our institution, more than at least 1 year postoperative follow-up. In the study of FA, patients with FA of less than 100 degrees were divided into Group L (n = 28), patients with FA of 130 degrees and greater were divided into Group H (n = 58). In the study of AR, patients with AR of less than 100% were divided into Group P (n = 46), patients with AR of 120% and greater were divided into Group G (n = 22). PCOR was statistically compared in each group, respectively. In FA, PCOR in Group L (0.385) was significantly lower (P = 0.027) than that in Group H (0.428). In AR, PCOR in Group P (0.376) was significantly lower (P = 0.0018) than that in Group G (0.456). We have concluded, though there are many factors influencing the range of movement after TKA, our newly defined PCOR could possibly serve as a parameter of postoperative flexion status of PS type TKA on plain X-ray photographs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17372749     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-007-0295-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  10 in total

1.  Radiographic measurement of the posterior femoral offset is not precise.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Sophie Honecker; Yves Chammai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Radiographic Evaluation of Alignment Following Total Knee Arthroplasty - a Systematic Review. Part II.

Authors:  Bogdan Stefan Cretu; Calin Dragosloveanu; Serban Dragosloveanu; Stefan Cristea
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2018-06

3.  Plain radiographs underestimate the asymmetry of the posterior condylar offset of the knee compared with MRI.

Authors:  Pramod B Voleti; Jason W Stephenson; Paul A Lotke; Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  No sex differences exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee.

Authors:  Pramod B Voleti; Jason W Stephenson; Paul A Lotke; Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Changes in femoral posterior condylar offset and knee flexion after PCL-substituting total knee arthroplasty: comparison of anterior and posterior referencing systems.

Authors:  Hyuksoo Han; Sohee Oh; Chong Bum Chang; Seung-Baik Kang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Cam impingement of the posterior femoral condyle in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Murat Bozkurt; Ramazan Akmese; Nurdan Cay; Çetin Isik; Yenel Gurkan Bilgetekin; Merve Gulbiz Kartal; Osman Tecimel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Can We Use the Posterior Condylar Off set as a Predictive Factor for Overhang of the Implant in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Yoon-Seok Youm; Sung-Do Cho; Jin Eo; Ki-Bong Park; Sun-Ho Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2011-09-26

8.  Effect of posterior femoral condylar offset and posterior tibial slope on maximal flexion angle of the knee in posterior cruciate ligament sacrificing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jong-Heon Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2013-05-29

9.  Biomechanical Effects of Posterior Condylar Offset and Posterior Tibial Slope on Quadriceps Force and Joint Contact Forces in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tak Kang; Yong-Gon Koh; Juhyun Son; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Jun-Sang Lee; Sae Kwang Kwon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  A computational simulation study to determine the biomechanical influence of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K-T Kang; Y-G Koh; J Son; O-R Kwon; J-S Lee; S K Kwon
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.853

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.