Literature DB >> 17372624

Generalizability of Gottman and Colleagues' Affective Process Models of Couples' Relationship Outcomes.

Hyoun K Kim1, Deborah M Capaldi, Lynn Crosby.   

Abstract

The generalizability of Gottman et al's. (1998) affective process models was examined using a community-based sample of 85 married or cohabiting couples with at-risk backgrounds. Predictive associations between affective processes assessed at about age 21 years and relationship status and satisfaction approximately 2.5 years later were examined. The major findings of Gottman et al. failed to replicate. In particular, men's rejection of their partners' influence, the lack of men's deescalation of partners' negative affect, and women's negative start up were not predictive of relationship status. Further, differences in affective processes were found when comparing discussion sessions of the men's versus the women's chosen topics. The findings suggested that the validity and utility of the affective process models need further investigation.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17372624      PMCID: PMC1828692          DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00343.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Marriage Fam        ISSN: 0022-2445


  13 in total

1.  Searching for a two-factor model of marriage duration: commentary on Gottman and Levenson.

Authors:  Michael L DeKay; Catherine G Greeno; Patricia R Houck
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2002

2.  Hierarchical modeling of sequential behavioral data: an empirical Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Getachew A Dagne; George W Howe; C Hendricks Brown; Bengt O Muthén
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-06

3.  A second failure to replicate the Gottman et al. (1995) typology of men who abuse intimate partners...and possible reasons why.

Authors:  Julia C Babcock; Charles E Green; Sarah A Webb; Katherine H Graham
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2004-06

4.  Does marital agony precede marital ecstasy? A comment on Gottman and Krokoff's "Marital interaction and satisfaction: a longitudinal view".

Authors:  E Z Woody; P R Costanzo
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1990-08

5.  The Hazards of Predicting Divorce Without Crossvalidation.

Authors:  Richard E Heyman; Amy M Smith Slep
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2001-05

6.  Longitudinal prediction of marital discord from premarital expressions of affect.

Authors:  D A Smith; D Vivian; K D O'Leary
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1990-12

Review 7.  The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, method, and research.

Authors:  B R Karney; T N Bradbury
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Marital interaction and satisfaction: a longitudinal view.

Authors:  J M Gottman; L J Krokoff
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1989-02

9.  Statistical significance in psychological research.

Authors:  D T Lykken
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict.

Authors:  A Christensen; C L Heavey
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-07
View more
  10 in total

1.  Does Couples' Communication Predict Marital Satisfaction, or Does Marital Satisfaction Predict Communication?

Authors:  Justin A Lavner; Benjamin R Karney; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2016-03-22

2.  Why do even satisfied newlyweds eventually go on to divorce?

Authors:  Justin A Lavner; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2011-10-31

3.  Patterns of Change in Marital Satisfaction Over the Newlywed Years.

Authors:  Justin A Lavner; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2010-10-01

4.  The Effects of Intimate Partner Violence on Relationship Satisfaction Over Time for Young At-Risk Couples: The Moderating Role of Observed Negative and Positive Affect.

Authors:  Joann Wu Shortt; Deborah M Capaldi; Hyoun K Kim; Heidemarie K Laurent
Journal:  Partner Abuse       Date:  2010

5.  Interaction and relationship development in stable young couples: effects of positive engagement, psychological aggression, and withdrawal.

Authors:  Heidemarie K Laurent; Hyoun K Kim; Deborah M Capaldi
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2007-12-27

6.  The blues of adolescent romance: observed affective interactions in adolescent romantic relationships associated with depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Thao Ha; Thomas J Dishion; Geertjan Overbeek; William J Burk; Rutger C M E Engels
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2014-05

7.  Growth of men's alcohol use in early adulthood: intimate partners' influence.

Authors:  Hyoun K Kim; Stacey S Tiberio; Katherine C Pears; Deborah M Capaldi; Isaac J Washburn
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2013-08-05

8.  Predicting couple therapy outcomes based on speech acoustic features.

Authors:  Md Nasir; Brian Robert Baucom; Panayiotis Georgiou; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Affective Behavior in Parent Couples Undergoing Couple Therapy: Contrasting Case Studies.

Authors:  Esther Liekmeier; Joëlle Darwiche; Lara Pinna; Anne-Sylvie Repond; Jean-Philippe Antonietti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-18

10.  Do conflict resolution and recovery predict the survival of adolescents' romantic relationships?

Authors:  Thao Ha; Geertjan Overbeek; Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff; Rutger C M E Engels
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.