Literature DB >> 17371927

Body size-independent safety margins for gas exchange across grasshopper species.

Kendra J Greenlee1, Christina Nebeker, Jon F Harrison.   

Abstract

Why is maximal insect body size relatively small compared to that of vertebrates? Possibly insect body size is limited by the capacity of the tracheal respiratory system to delivery oxygen down longer and longer tracheae to the tissues. If so, one possible outcome would be that larger insect species would have a smaller safety margin for oxygen delivery (higher critical P(O2), P(c)). We tested this idea by exposing inactive adult grasshoppers of a range of species and body sizes (0.07-6.4 g) to progressively lower oxygen atmospheres and measuring their ventilation frequency and their ability to maintain metabolic rate (indexed by CO(2) emission rate). We analyzed effects of body size on these parameters by simple linear regressions, as well as methods to control for phylogenetic relatedness among species. We found interspecific variation in P(c), but P(c) did not significantly correlate with body mass (average P(c) across all species = 4 kPa). Maximal tracheal system conductance scaled approximately with mass(0.7), and estimated ventilation in hypoxia (ventilatory frequency x tidal volume) scaled directly with mass, suggesting that convection is the major mechanism of gas exchange in all these species. These comparative data strengthen the growing body of evidence that body size does not affect the safety margin for oxygen delivery in insects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17371927     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.001982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

1.  Scaling of gas exchange cycle frequency in insects.

Authors:  John S Terblanche; Craig R White; Tim M Blackburn; Elrike Marais; Steven L Chown
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Atmospheric oxygen level and the evolution of insect body size.

Authors:  Jon F Harrison; Alexander Kaiser; John M VandenBrooks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  The evolutionary consequences of oxygenic photosynthesis: a body size perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan L Payne; Craig R McClain; Alison G Boyer; James H Brown; Seth Finnegan; Michał Kowalewski; Richard A Krause; S Kathleen Lyons; Daniel W McShea; Philip M Novack-Gottshall; Felisa A Smith; Paula Spaeth; Jennifer A Stempien; Steve C Wang
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Hypoxia-induced compression in the tracheal system of the tobacco hornworm caterpillar, Manduca sexta.

Authors:  Kendra J Greenlee; John J Socha; Haleigh B Eubanks; Paul Pedersen; Wah-Keat Lee; Scott D Kirkton
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Increase in tracheal investment with beetle size supports hypothesis of oxygen limitation on insect gigantism.

Authors:  Alexander Kaiser; C Jaco Klok; John J Socha; Wah-Keat Lee; Michael C Quinlan; Jon F Harrison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Evolution of air breathing: oxygen homeostasis and the transitions from water to land and sky.

Authors:  Connie C W Hsia; Anke Schmitz; Markus Lambertz; Steven F Perry; John N Maina
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 9.090

7.  Oxygen-limited thermal tolerance is seen in a plastron-breathing insect and can be induced in a bimodal gas exchanger.

Authors:  Wilco C E P Verberk; David T Bilton
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.312

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.