Literature DB >> 17371917

Scaling of contractile properties of catfish feeding muscles.

Sam Van Wassenbergh1, Anthony Herrel, Rob S James, Peter Aerts.   

Abstract

Biomechanical models are intrinsically limited in explaining the ontogenetic scaling relationships for prey capture kinematics in aquatic vertebrates because no data are available on the scaling of intrinsic contractile properties of the muscles that power feeding. However, functional insight into scaling relationships is fundamental to our understanding of the ecology, performance and evolution of animals. In this study, in vitro contractile properties of three feeding muscles were determined for a series of different sizes of African air-breathing catfishes (Clarias gariepinus). These muscles were the mouth closer musculus adductor mandibulae A2A3', the mouth opener m. protractor hyoidei and the hypaxial muscles responsible for pectoral girdle retraction. Tetanus and twitch activation rise times increased significantly with size, while latency time was size independent. In accordance with the decrease in feeding velocity with increasing size, the cycle frequency for maximal power output of the protractor hyoidei and the adductor mandibulae showed a negative scaling relationship. Theoretical modelling predicts a scaling relationship for in vivo muscle function during which these muscles always produced at least 80% of their maximal in vitro power. These findings suggest that the contractile properties of these feeding muscles are fine-tuned to the changes in biomechanical constraints of movement of the feeding apparatus during ontogeny. However, each muscle appears to have a unique set of contractile properties. The hypaxials, the most important muscle for powering suction feeding in clariid catfish, differed from the other muscles by generating higher maximal stress and mass-specific power output with increased size, whilst the optimum cycle frequency for maximal power output only decreased significantly with size in the larger adults (cranial lengths greater than 60 mm).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17371917     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.000109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  10 in total

1.  Dimorphism throughout the European eel's life cycle: are ontogenetic changes in head shape related to dietary differences?

Authors:  J De Meyer; T Goethals; S Van Wassenbergh; T Augustijns; J Habraken; J Hellemans; V Vandewiele; J Dhaene; M Bouillart; D Adriaens
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Scaling of work and power in a locomotor muscle of a frog.

Authors:  J P Olberding; S M Deban
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Feeding biomechanics of the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, over ontogeny.

Authors:  Matthew A Kolmann; Daniel R Huber; Philip J Motta; R Dean Grubbs
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Suction is kid's play: extremely fast suction in newborn seahorses.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Gert Roos; Annelies Genbrugge; Heleen Leysen; Peter Aerts; Dominique Adriaens; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Feeding muscles scale differently from swimming muscles in sunfish (Centrarchidae).

Authors:  Andrew M Carroll; Ashley M Ambrose; Terri A Anderson; David J Coughlin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Molecular plasticity and functional enhancements of leg muscles in response to hypergravity in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Rudolf J Schilder; Megan Raynor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Development of the ultrastructure of sonic muscles: a kind of neoteny?

Authors:  Sandie Millot; Eric Parmentier
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  New insights into muscle function during pivot feeding in seahorses.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Billy Dries; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fishes can use axial muscles as anchors or motors for powerful suction feeding.

Authors:  Ariel L Camp; Aaron M Olsen; L Patricia Hernandez; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Phenotypic flexibility of gape anatomy fine-tunes the aquatic prey-capture system of newts.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Egon Heiss
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.