Literature DB >> 17371749

Remote ICU care programs: current status.

Michael J Breslow1.   

Abstract

The desire to provide continuous intensivist management for all intensive care unit (ICU) patients in the face of a massive shortfall of available intensivists prompted the introduction of remote ICU care programs in 1999. The past several years have seen a dramatic increase in the number of health systems adopting this care model. These health systems have increased our understanding of both the ability of this new care model to improve clinical outcomes and the clinical processes that are required to achieve program quality goals. Health systems have begun to expand the scope of activities of the remote care team, capitalizing on the potential of this new operational and technology platform to leverage scarce personnel and achieve increases in both clinical effectiveness and provider efficiency. This review summarizes the current state of remote ICU care programs in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17371749     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  10 in total

Review 1.  Health technology assessment review: remote monitoring of vital signs--current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Vishal Nangalia; David R Prytherch; Gary B Smith
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 2.  Monitoring cardiorespiratory instability: Current approaches and implications for nursing practice.

Authors:  Eliezer Bose; Leslie Hoffman; Marilyn Hravnak
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 3.072

Review 3.  Staff acceptance of tele-ICU coverage: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lance Brendan Young; Paul S Chan; Peter Cram
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Costs and cost-effectiveness of a telemedicine intensive care unit program in 6 intensive care units in a large health care system.

Authors:  Luisa Franzini; Kavita R Sail; Eric J Thomas; Laura Wueste
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.425

5.  Work System Barriers and Strategies Reported by Tele-Intensive Care Unit Nurses: A Case Study.

Authors:  Peter L T Hoonakker; Pascale Carayon
Journal:  Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.326

6.  Adoption of ICU telemedicine in the United States.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Brandon D Cicero; David J Wallace; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  ICU Telemedicine and Critical Care Mortality: A National Effectiveness Study.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Tri Q Le; Amber E Barnato; Marilyn Hravnak; Courtney C Kuza; Francis Pike; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Time series analysis as input for clinical predictive modeling: modeling cardiac arrest in a pediatric ICU.

Authors:  Curtis E Kennedy; James P Turley
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.432

Review 9.  Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults.

Authors:  Neill K J Adhikari; Robert A Fowler; Satish Bhagwanjee; Gordon D Rubenfeld
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Identifying Strategies for Effective Telemedicine Use in Intensive Care Units: The ConnECCT Study Protocol.

Authors:  Kimberly J Rak; Courtney C Kuza; Laura Ellen Ashcraft; Penelope K Morrison; Derek C Angus; Amber E Barnato; Marilyn Hravnak; Tina B Hershey; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Int J Qual Methods       Date:  2017-10-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.