Literature DB >> 17371723

A quantitative comparison of two methods to correct eddy current-induced distortions in DT-MRI.

Susana Muñoz Maniega1, Mark E Bastin, Paul A Armitage.   

Abstract

Eddy current-induced geometric distortions of single-shot, diffusion-weighted, echo-planar (DW-EP) images are a major confounding factor to the accurate determination of water diffusion parameters in diffusion tensor MRI (DT-MRI). Previously, it has been suggested that these geometric distortions can be removed from brain DW-EP images using affine transformations determined from phantom calibration experiments using iterative cross-correlation (ICC). Since this approach was first described, a number of image-based registration methods have become available that can also correct eddy current-induced distortions in DW-EP images. However, as yet no study has investigated whether separate eddy current calibration or image-based registration provides the most accurate way of removing these artefacts from DT-MRI data. Here we compare how ICC phantom calibration and affine FLIRT (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk), a popular image-based multi-modal registration method that can correct both eddy current-induced distortions and bulk subject motion, perform when registering DW-EP images acquired with different slice thicknesses (2.8 and 5 mm) and b-values (1000 and 3000 s/mm(2)). With the use of consistency testing, it was found that ICC was a more robust algorithm for correcting eddy current-induced distortions than affine FLIRT, especially at high b-value and small slice thickness. In addition, principal component analysis demonstrated that the combination of ICC phantom calibration (to remove eddy current-induced distortions) with rigid body FLIRT (to remove bulk subject motion) provided a more accurate registration of DT-MRI data than that achieved by affine FLIRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17371723     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  3 in total

1.  Motion correction in diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast at 3T.

Authors:  Lori R Arlinghaus; E Brian Welch; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Lei Xu; Jaime S Farley; Vandana G Abramson; Ana M Grau; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid A Mayer; Julie A Means-Powell; Ingrid M Meszoely; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Improving the correction of eddy current-induced distortion in diffusion-weighted images by excluding signals from the cerebral spinal fluid.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Xiaozheng Liu; Guang Yang; Zhenyu Zhou; Yongdi Zhou; Gengying Li; Marc Dubin; Ravi Bansal; Bradley S Peterson; Dongrong Xu
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  The impact of post-processing on spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Siawoosh Mohammadi; Patrick Freund; Thorsten Feiweier; Armin Curt; Nikolaus Weiskopf
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.556

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.