Literature DB >> 1737150

Using clinicopathological analysis of general practitioner skin surgery to determine educational requirements and guidelines.

N H Cox1, R Wagstaff, A W Popple.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of skin surgery in general practice on the workload of a pathology laboratory and to identify what further training might be helpful.
DESIGN: Analysis of skin biopsy specimens from general practitioners before and after their new contract to determine numbers of specimens, changes in diagnoses, adequacy of treatment of malignant tumours, and areas of low diagnostic accuracy.
SETTING: District general hospital.
SUBJECTS: All 1017 skin biopsy specimens from general practice for 15 months before and 12 months after the new general practitioner contract.
RESULTS: The number of pathology specimens received increased from 16 to 65 per month (median = 6 submitted by each general practitioner in the post-contract year). The proportion of the more common pathological diagnoses was unchanged between the two periods, but the proportion of correctly diagnosed naevi, cysts, and seborrhoeic keratoses increased in the second. Although few diagnoses were overtly incorrect, accurate diagnosis of dermatofibromas and malignancies decreased after the contract, and the overall correct diagnosis rate for seborrhoeic keratoses, dermatofibromas, rashes, and malignancies was below 30%. Only nine out of 21 squamous cell carcinomas were adequately excised with tumour free margins, and follow up of malignant tumours may have been inadequate.
CONCLUSIONS: Skin surgery in general practice has advantages but matters of concern are the increase in laboratory workload, the excision of some benign lesions, and the inappropriateness of biopsy of rashes. Squamous cell carcinoma and other malignant tumours submitted for pathological examination were often unsuspected and inadequately excised, and heightened suspicion is recommended. Pathology request forms may need redesigning to encourage provision of clinical details.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1737150      PMCID: PMC1880974          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6819.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  9 in total

1.  Initiation and evaluation of a pilot scheme for minor surgery in general practice.

Authors:  E Godfrey; M Watkiss; H Schnieden
Journal:  Health Trends       Date:  1990

2.  Training for minor surgery in general practice during preregistration surgical posts.

Authors:  M Pringle; J Hasler; P De Marco
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-06

3.  Diagnostic accuracy and appropriateness of care for seborrheic keratoses. A pilot study of an approach to quality assurance for cutaneous surgery.

Authors:  R S Stern; C Boudreaux; K A Arndt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Adequacy of general practitioners' premises for minor surgery.

Authors:  N Zoltie; G Hoult
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-20

5.  Decontamination of instruments and control of cross infection in general practice.

Authors:  D R Morgan; T J Lamont; J D Dawson; C Booth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-05-26

6.  Screening and the 1990 contract.

Authors:  D Slater
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-04-21

7.  Minor operations in general practice.

Authors:  J S Brown
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-06-16

8.  Patient's response to a general practice minor surgery service.

Authors:  J Sharman
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1986-01

9.  Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis and outcome of follow-up in Australia.

Authors:  R L Nixon; A P Dorevitch; R Marks
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1986-03-03       Impact factor: 7.738

  9 in total
  14 in total

1.  [Evaluation of continuous education: from the satisfaction to the impact. With regard to a formative programme in minor surgery in a health area].

Authors:  J Martín Fernández; M Martínez Marcos; J Ferrándiz Santos
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-04-30       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  [Minor surgery in primary care: is continuing education within the team a valid strategy for improving quality?].

Authors:  J F Menárguez Puche; P A Alcántara Muñoz; J D González Caballero; A García Canovas; M López Piñera; J Cruzado Quevedo
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  General practitioners and skin biopsy.

Authors:  F H Rampen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-29

4.  Cost effectiveness of minor surgery in general practice.

Authors:  J Stainforth; M J Goodfield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  [Minor surgery: satisfaction and quality?].

Authors:  Zaida Caurel Sastre; Noelia Caballero Encinar
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  General practitioners as providers of minor surgery--a success story?

Authors:  J S Brown; R R Smith; T Cantor; D Chesover; R Yearsley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Minor surgical procedures. Faculty development workshop.

Authors:  L Nasmith; E D Franco
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  What is interface audit?

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Potential pitfalls of minor surgery in general practice.

Authors:  D P Berry; K G Harding
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Use of histopathology services by general practitioners: recent changes in referral practice.

Authors:  K Shorrock
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.