| Literature DB >> 17370511 |
Mustafizur Rahman1, Rasheda Sultana, Giasuddin Ahmed, Sharifun Nahar, Zahid M Hassan, Farjana Saiada, Goutam Podder, Abu S G Faruque, A K Siddique, David A Sack, Jelle Matthijnssens, Marc Van Ranst, Tasnim Azim.
Abstract
Approximately 20,000 stool specimens from patients with diarrhea visiting 1 urban and 1 rural hospital in Bangladesh during January 2001-May 2006 were tested for group A rotavirus antigen, and 4,712 (24.0%) were positive. G and P genotyping was performed on a subset of 10% of the positive samples (n = 471). During the 2001-2005 rotavirus seasons, G1P[8] (36.4%) and G9P[8] (27.7%) were the dominant strains, but G2[4] and G12P[6] were present in 15.4% and 3.1% of the rotavirus-positive patients, respectively. During the 2005-06 rotavirus season, G2P[4] (43.2%) appeared as the most prevalent strain, and G12P[6] became a more prevalent strain (11.1%) during this season. Because recently licensed rotavirus vaccines include only the P[8] specificity, it is unknown how the vaccines will perform in settings where non-P[8] types are prevalent.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17370511 PMCID: PMC2725799 DOI: 10.3201/eid1301.060910
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Oligonucleotide primers used in the study for PCR amplification
| Primer | Type | Position (nt) | Strand | Sequence (5′–3′) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beg9 | VP7 | 1–28 | Plus | GGCTTTAAAAGAGAGAATTTCCGTCTGG | ( |
| End9 | VP7 | 1062–1036 | Minus | GGTCACATCATACAATTCTAATCTAAG | ( |
| RVG9 | VP7 | 1062–1044 | Minus | GGTCACATCATACAATTCT | ( |
| Con2 | VP4 | 868–887 | Minus | ATTTCGGACCATTTATAACC | ( |
| Con3 | VP4 | 11–32 | Plus | TGGCTTCGCCATTTTATAGACA | ( |
| MR-G1 | G1 | 314–335 | Plus | CAAGTACTCAAATCAGTGATGG | Present study |
| MR-G2 | G2 | 436–459 | Plus | CTATGAATCCACAACTGTATTGTG | Present study |
| aET3 | G3 | 689–709 | Plus | CGTTTGAAGAAGTTGCAACAG | ( |
| MR-G4 | G4 | 480–499 | Plus | GCTTCTGGTGAAGAGTTG | Present study |
| aAT8 | G8 | 178–198 | Plus | GTCACACCATTTGTAAATTCG | ( |
| MR-G9 | G9 | 757–776 | Plus | GAACCATAAACTTGATGTG | Present study |
| MR-P8 | P[8] | 314–335 | Minus | TCTACTGGATCGACGTGC | Present study |
| MR-P4 | P[4] | 474–494 | Minus | CTATTATTAGAGGTTAAAGTC | Present study |
| 3T-1 | P[6] | 259–278 | Minus | TGTTGATTAGTTGGATTCAA | ( |
| 4T-1 | P[9] | 385–402 | Minus | TGAGACATGCAATTGGAC | ( |
| ND2 | P[11] | 116–133 | Minus | AGCGAACTCACCAATCTG | ( |
Distribution of specimens positive for rotavirus, Bangladesh, January 2001–May 2006
| Rotavirus season* | Dhaka | Matlab | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. tested | Rotavirus-positive (%) | No. tested | Rotavirus-positive (%) | |
| 2000–01† | 879 | 214 (24.3) | 715 | 202 (28.3) |
| 2001–02 | 1,824 | 563 (30.9) | 1,665 | 428 (25.7) |
| 2002–03 | 1,806 | 458 (25.4) | 1,583 | 338 (21.4) |
| 2003–04 | 1,786 | 458 (25.6) | 1,425 | 281 (19.7) |
| 2004–05 | 2,374 | 521 (21.9) | 1,547 | 350 (22.6) |
| 2005–06 | 2,070 | 492 (23.8) | 1,365 | 339 (24.8) |
| Total | 10,739 | 2,706 (25.2) | 8,300 | 1,938 (23.3) |
*Each season starts in June and ends in May of the following year. †Data from January–May 2001 only.
Figure 1Age distribution for rotavirus-positive patients, Bangladesh, 2001–2005.
Figure 2Distribution of rotavirus-positive patients by month, Dhaka and Matlab, Bangladesh. Percentages of positive rotavirus patients were calculated based on all diarrhea patients admitted to the Dhaka and Matlab hospital surveillance system during 2001–2005. The years are shown with different colored lines. The thick brown line represents the average for all years.
Figure 3Correlation between cases of rotavirus diarrhea and air temperature and water level in Dhaka, Bangladesh, January 2001–May 2005.
Distribution of G and P genotypes of rotavirus strains, Bangladesh, January 2001–May 2006
| G type | P type | No. (%) rotavirus strains* | Total no. (%) rotavirus strains | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dhaka | Matlab | |||
| G1 | P[6] | 1 (0.4) | 2 (1.0) | 3 (0.6) |
| G1 | P[8] | 85 (31.3) | 74 (37.2) | 159 (33.8) |
| G2 | P[4] | 55 (20.2) | 40 (20.1) | 95 (20.2) |
| G2 | P[6] | 1 (0.4) | 0 | 1 (0.2) |
| G2 | P[8] | 2 (0.7) | 0 | 2 (0.4) |
| G4 | P[8] | 26 (9.6) | 13 (6.5) | 39 (8.3) |
| G9 | P[6] | 7 (2.6) | 2 (1.0) | 9 (1.9) |
| G9 | P[8] | 67 (24.6) | 52 (26.1) | 119 (25.3) |
| G11 | P[6] | 1 (0.4) | 0 | 1 (0.2) |
| G11 | P[8] | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.5) | 2 (0.4) |
| G12 | P[6] | 16 (5.9) | 5 (2.5) | 21 (4.5) |
| G12 | P[8] | 2 (0.7) | 3 (1.5) | 5 (1.1) |
| Mixed G/P | 8 (3.0) | 7 (3.5) | 15 (3.2) | |
| Total | 272 (100.1) | 199 (99.9) | 471 (100.0) | |
*The percentage of the total for Dhaka is >100% and for Matlab <100% because each number was rounded off to the nearest one tenth of 1%.
Figure 4Temporal changes of the distribution of major rotavirus genotypes in Bangladesh, 2001–2006.