Literature DB >> 17370278

Compostability of bioplastic packaging materials: an overview.

Gaurav Kale1, Thitisilp Kijchavengkul, Rafael Auras, Maria Rubino, Susan E Selke, Sher Paul Singh.   

Abstract

Packaging waste accounted for 78.81 million tons or 31.6% of the total municipal solid waste (MSW) in 2003 in the USA, 56.3 million tons or 25% of the MSW in 2005 in Europe, and 3.3 million tons or 10% of the MSW in 2004 in Australia. Currently, in the USA the dominant method of packaging waste disposal is landfill, followed by recycling, incineration, and composting. Since landfill occupies valuable space and results in the generation of greenhouse gases and contaminants, recovery methods such as reuse, recycling and/or composting are encouraged as a way of reducing packaging waste disposal. Most of the common materials used in packaging (i.e., steel, aluminum, glass, paper, paperboard, plastics, and wood) can be efficiently recovered by recycling; however, if packaging materials are soiled with foods or other biological substances, physical recycling of these materials may be impractical. Therefore, composting some of these packaging materials is a promising way to reduce MSW. As biopolymers are developed and increasingly used in applications such as food, pharmaceutical, and consumer goods packaging, composting could become one of the prevailing methods for disposal of packaging waste provided that industry, governments, and consumers encourage and embrace this alternative. The main objective of this article is to provide an overview of the current situation of packaging compostability, to describe the main mechanisms that make a biopolymer compostable, to delineate the main methods to compost these biomaterials, and to explain the main standards for assessing compostability, and the current status of biopolymer labeling. Biopolymers such as polylactide and poly(hydroxybutyrate) are increasingly becoming available for use in food, medical, and consumer goods packaging applications. The main claims of these new biomaterials are that they are obtained from renewable resources and that they can be biodegraded in biological environments such as soil and compost. Although recycling could be energetically more favorable than composting for these materials, it may not be practical because of excessive sorting and cleaning requirements. Therefore, the main focus is to dispose them by composting. So far, there is no formal agreement between companies, governments and consumers as to how this packaging composting will take place; therefore, the main drivers for their use have been green marketing and pseudo-environmental consciousness related to high fuel prices. Packaging compostability could be an alternative for the disposal of biobased materials as long as society as a whole is willing to formally address the challenge to clearly understand the cradle-to-grave life of a compostable package, and to include these new compostable polymers in food, manure, or yard waste composting facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17370278     DOI: 10.1002/mabi.200600168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Macromol Biosci        ISSN: 1616-5187            Impact factor:   4.979


  21 in total

1.  Biodegradable packaging materials conception based on starch and polylactic acid (PLA) reinforced with cellulose.

Authors:  Fatma Masmoudi; Atef Bessadok; Mohamed Dammak; Mohamed Jaziri; Emna Ammar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Biodegradation of plastics: current scenario and future prospects for environmental safety.

Authors:  Temoor Ahmed; Muhammad Shahid; Farrukh Azeem; Ijaz Rasul; Asad Ali Shah; Muhammad Noman; Amir Hameed; Natasha Manzoor; Irfan Manzoor; Sher Muhammad
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Bridging Three Gaps in Biodegradable Plastics: Misconceptions and Truths About Biodegradation.

Authors:  Shinhyeong Choe; Yujin Kim; Yejin Won; Jaewook Myung
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.221

4.  Core Concept: Bioplastics offer carbon-cutting advantages but are no panacea.

Authors:  M Mitchell Waldrop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Bio-based polycarbonate as synthetic toolbox.

Authors:  O Hauenstein; S Agarwal; A Greiner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Green Preparation of Straw Fiber Reinforced Hydrolyzed Soy Protein Isolate/Urea/Formaldehyde Composites for Biocomposite Flower Pots Application.

Authors:  Enhui Sun; Guangfu Liao; Qian Zhang; Ping Qu; Guofeng Wu; Yueding Xu; Cheng Yong; Hongying Huang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Effect of Nano-Clay and Surfactant on the Biodegradation of Poly(Lactic Acid) Films.

Authors:  Pooja C Mayekar; Edgar Castro-Aguirre; Rafael Auras; Susan Selke; Ramani Narayan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  A study of the controlled degradation of polypropylene containing pro-oxidant agents.

Authors:  Celso Luis de Carvalho; Alexandre F Silveira; Derval Dos Santos Rosa
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-11-20

Review 9.  On the Use of PLA-PHB Blends for Sustainable Food Packaging Applications.

Authors:  Marina Patricia Arrieta; María Dolores Samper; Miguel Aldas; Juan López
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Effect of Selected Commercial Plasticizers on Mechanical, Thermal, and Morphological Properties of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/Poly(lactic acid)/Plasticizer Biodegradable Blends for Three-Dimensional (3D) Print.

Authors:  Přemysl Menčík; Radek Přikryl; Ivana Stehnová; Veronika Melčová; Soňa Kontárová; Silvestr Figalla; Pavol Alexy; Ján Bočkaj
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.