Literature DB >> 17369600

Burden of cervical cancer in Europe: estimates for 2004.

M Arbyn1, A O Raifu, P Autier, J Ferlay.   

Abstract

The European Council recommends that organised cervical cancer screening be offered in all member states. In order to evaluate the impact of existing and new prevention methods, regularly updated information on the burden of cervical cancer is needed. The best estimates of mortality and incidence rates were applied to the 2004 projected population of 40 European countries using methods developed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Using the absolute number of cases and deaths, the standardised and cumulative rates (up to age of 74 years) were computed for individual countries, and aggregated for the 15 old (EU15) and the 10 new member states (EU10) of the European Union (EU25). For the 28 countries (25 belonging to the EU25 and three others), deaths from not otherwise specified uterine cancer were reallocated to cervix or corpus uteri cancer using age-specific rules described in GLOBOCAN 2002. The burden of cervical cancer deaths in the whole of Europe was assessed by analysing uterus cancer mortality in women aged <45 years. In 2004, approximately 31,000 women in the EU25 developed cervical cancer and almost 14,000 died from the disease. A striking contrast is noted between the 15 old and 10 new EU member states: world age-standardised incidence rates (per 10(5) women-years) of 9.5 versus 16.7; standardised mortality rates of 4.9 versus 10.7; cumulative mortality rate of 0.27% versus 0.71%. The burden was lowest in Finland (cumulative incidence and mortality rate of 0.38% and 0.12%, respectively) and highest in Lithuania (cumulative incidence and mortality of 1.64% and 0.94%, respectively). The mapping of uterine cancer mortality among women aged <45 years indicates that the burden of cervical cancer is particularly high across the whole of Eastern Europe. Cervical cancer still constitutes a considerable public health problem in Europe. The dramatic contrast between West and East European states merits particular attention from the health authorities of the countries concerned and the EU as a whole. The European Commission should maintain cervical cancer control in future action plans and increase support to the most affected member states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17369600     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  22 in total

1.  Selecting a mix of prevention strategies against cervical cancer for maximum efficiency with an optimization program.

Authors:  Nadia Demarteau; Thomas Breuer; Baudouin Standaert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Contribution of IL12A and IL12B polymorphisms to the risk of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Andrzej Roszak; Adrianna Mostowska; Anna Sowińska; Margarita Lianeri; Pawel P Jagodziński
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Larysa Rydzewska; Jayne Tierney; Claire L Vale; Paul R Symonds
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

Review 4.  Translational mini-review series on vaccines: Monitoring of human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  J Dillner; M Arbyn; L Dillner
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Prevalence of the NKG2D Thr72Ala polymorphism in patients with cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrzej Roszak; Margarita Lianeri; Paweł P Jagodziński
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2012-04-05

Review 6.  Monitoring of human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  J Dillner; M Arbyn; E Unger; L Dillner
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Young women's constructions of the HPV vaccine: a cross-cultural, qualitative study in Scotland, Spain, Serbia and Bulgaria.

Authors:  Carol Gray Brunton; Ingeborg Farver; Moritz Jäger; Anita Lenneis; Kadi Parve; Dina Patarcic; Dafina Petrova; Rhona Hogg; Catriona Kennedy; Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Irina Todorova
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02

8.  European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Second edition--summary document.

Authors:  M Arbyn; A Anttila; J Jordan; G Ronco; U Schenck; N Segnan; H Wiener; A Herbert; L von Karsa
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 9.  Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 10.  Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara J Selman; Christopher Mann; Javier Zamora; Tracy-Louise Appleyard; Khalid Khan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.