BACKGROUND: Previous studies report that motor recovery after partial destruction of the primary motor cortex (M1) may be associated with adaptive functional reorganization within spared M1. OBJECTIVE: To test feasible methodologies for evaluating relationships between behavioral gains facilitated by rehabilitative training and functional adaptations in perilesional M1 and the cerebellum. METHODS: Four patients with hemiparesis for more than 3 months after a cortical lesion partially within M1 and 12 healthy volunteers participated. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) using a finger-tapping task and concurrent behavioral assessments, including the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment of the upper extremity and the Wolf Motor Function Test, were conducted before and after 2 weeks of arm-focused training; 2 patients were further examined 6 and 12 months later to evaluate long-term persistence of brain-behavior adaptations. RESULTS: All patients showed higher activation magnitude in perilesional M1 than healthy controls before and after therapy. Further long-term functional gains paralleled the decrease of activation magnitude in perilesional M1 in the 2 more impaired cases. CONCLUSION: The evolution of suggestive correlations between serial scans of fMRI adaptive activity within the primary motor cortex and the cerebellum in relation to relevant behavioral changes over the course of 2 weeks of task-specific therapy and then no formal therapy suggests that repeated assessments may be best for monitoring therapy-induced neuroplasticity. This approach may help develop optimal rehabilitation strategies to maximize poststroke motor recovery as well as improve the search for brain-behavior correlations in functional neuroimaging research.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies report that motor recovery after partial destruction of the primary motor cortex (M1) may be associated with adaptive functional reorganization within spared M1. OBJECTIVE: To test feasible methodologies for evaluating relationships between behavioral gains facilitated by rehabilitative training and functional adaptations in perilesional M1 and the cerebellum. METHODS: Four patients with hemiparesis for more than 3 months after a cortical lesion partially within M1 and 12 healthy volunteers participated. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) using a finger-tapping task and concurrent behavioral assessments, including the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment of the upper extremity and the Wolf Motor Function Test, were conducted before and after 2 weeks of arm-focused training; 2 patients were further examined 6 and 12 months later to evaluate long-term persistence of brain-behavior adaptations. RESULTS: All patients showed higher activation magnitude in perilesional M1 than healthy controls before and after therapy. Further long-term functional gains paralleled the decrease of activation magnitude in perilesional M1 in the 2 more impaired cases. CONCLUSION: The evolution of suggestive correlations between serial scans of fMRI adaptive activity within the primary motor cortex and the cerebellum in relation to relevant behavioral changes over the course of 2 weeks of task-specific therapy and then no formal therapy suggests that repeated assessments may be best for monitoring therapy-induced neuroplasticity. This approach may help develop optimal rehabilitation strategies to maximize poststroke motor recovery as well as improve the search for brain-behavior correlations in functional neuroimaging research.
Authors: Seung-Schik Yoo; Xingchang Wei; Chandlee C Dickey; Charles R G Guttmann; Lawrence P Panych Journal: Int J Neurosci Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.292
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: George F Wittenberg; Robert Chen; Kenji Ishii; Khalafalla O Bushara; Susan Eckloff; Earllaine Croarkin; Edward Taub; Lynn H Gerber; Mark Hallett; Leonardo G Cohen Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Ella M R Fonteyn; Samyra H J Keus; Carla C P Verstappen; Ludger Schöls; Imelda J M de Groot; Bart P C van de Warrenburg Journal: J Neurol Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Dionyssios Mintzopoulos; Loukas G Astrakas; Azadeh Khanicheh; Angelos A Konstas; Aneesh Singhal; Michael A Moskowitz; Bruce R Rosen; A Aria Tzika Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-03-12 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Lumy Sawaki; Andrew J Butler; Xiaoyan Leng; Peter A Wassenaar; Yousef M Mohammad; Sarah Blanton; K Sathian; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen; Steven L Wolf; David C Good; George F Wittenberg Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: A Lex E Q van Delden; C Lieke E Peper; Jaap Harlaar; Andreas Daffertshofer; Nienke I Zijp; Kirsten Nienhuys; Peter Koppe; Gert Kwakkel; Peter J Beek Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2009-11-06 Impact factor: 2.474