Literature DB >> 17368641

Sex differences in acute energy intake regulation.

Brenda M Davy1, Emily L Van Walleghen, Jeb S Orr.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine if energy intake compensation is more accurate in males compared to females matched for age, habitual physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and dietary cognitive restraint. Healthy, nonobese young men (n=12) and women (n=12) were provided with an ad libitum lunch meal on two occasions. Thirty minutes prior to the lunch meals, subjects were given either a yogurt preload (YP; 500 mL, 1988 kJ, men; 375 mL, 1507 kJ, women) or no preload (NP). Energy intake at the two lunch meals was measured. Visual analog scales were used to assess changes in hunger and fullness. Blood glucose concentrations were also determined. Energy intake compensation for the YP was significantly more accurate in the male compared to the female subjects (86.2+/-5.0 vs. 73.6+/-4.8% compensation). There were no sex differences in perceptions of hunger and satiety. In the pooled sample, hunger ratings were significantly higher in the NP condition, but there were no significant differences in fullness ratings between test meals. In the YP condition, glycemic response to the preload and the ad libitum meal was significantly higher in males compared to females. These results suggest that under acute test meal conditions, energy intake regulation is more accurate in males. Relative inability to regulate energy intake may predispose females to gain weight over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17368641     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  10 in total

1.  Effects of food form on food intake and postprandial appetite sensations, glucose and endocrine responses, and energy expenditure in resistance trained v. sedentary older adults.

Authors:  John W Apolzan; Heather J Leidy; Richard D Mattes; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Within-person compensation for snack energy by US adults, NHANES 2007-2014.

Authors:  Ashima K Kant; Barry I Graubard
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Association of food form with self-reported 24-h energy intake and meal patterns in US adults: NHANES 2003-2008.

Authors:  Ashima K Kant; Barry I Graubard; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 4.  Sex differences in the physiology of eating.

Authors:  Lori Asarian; Nori Geary
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Polydextrose: its impact on short-term food intake and subjective feelings of satiety in males-a randomized controlled cross-over study.

Authors:  Viren Ranawana; Adelaide Muller; C Jeya K Henry
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.614

6.  Age and physical activity status effects on appetite and mood state in older humans.

Authors:  John W Apolzan; Michael G Flynn; Brian K McFarlin; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.665

7.  Does milk matter: Is children's intake affected by the type or amount of milk served at a meal?

Authors:  Samantha M R Kling; Liane S Roe; Christine E Sanchez; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  The Acute Effects of Breakfast Drinks with Varying Protein and Energy Contents on Appetite and Free-Living Energy Intake in UK Older Adults.

Authors:  Daniel R Crabtree; Adrian Holliday; William Buosi; Claire L Fyfe; Graham W Horgan; Alexandra M Johnstone
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-30

Review 9.  Factors that determine energy compensation: a systematic review of preload studies.

Authors:  Eva Almiron-Roig; Luigi Palla; Kathryn Guest; Cassandra Ricchiuti; Neil Vint; Susan A Jebb; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 7.110

10.  Response: Premeal Consumption of a Protein-Enriched, Dietary Fiber-Fortified Bar Decreases Total Energy Intake in Healthy Individuals (Diabetes Metab J 2019;43:879-92).

Authors:  Chang Ho Ahn; Jae Hyun Bae; Young Min Cho
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.376

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.