Literature DB >> 17368465

Intrinsic foot kinematics measured in vivo during the stance phase of slow running.

A Arndt1, P Wolf, A Liu, C Nester, A Stacoff, R Jones, P Lundgren, A Lundberg.   

Abstract

An accurate kinematic description of the intrinsic articulations of the foot during running has not previously been presented, primarily due to methodological limitations. An invasive method based upon reflective marker arrays mounted on intracortical pins drilled into the bones was used in this study. Four male volunteers participated as subjects. Pins (1.6mm diameter) were inserted under local anaesthetic in the tibia, fibula, calcaneus, talus, navicular, cuboid, medial cuneiform and metatarsals I and V. A 10 camera motion analysis system was used for kinematic data capture and the ground reaction force was simultaneously measured. Segment motion relative to adjacent proximal segments was determined using helical axes projected into the coordinate system of the proximal segment. Coefficients of multiple correlation calculated to determine the strength of association between running style with and without the pins inserted indicated that the subjects had little restriction due to the inserted pins. Individual and mean results were presented for rotations defined in the planes of the proximal segment's coordinate system and showed frontal plane rotation of the talocrural joint (12.2+/-7.1 degrees ), which exceeded that of the subtalar joint (8.9+/-3.2 degrees ). Considerable mobility of the talonavicular joint was found (6.5+/-2.9 degrees , 13.5+/-4.1 degrees and 8.7+/-1.4 degrees in the sagittal, frontal and transverse planes, respectively). Furthermore, little, but non-negligible motion between the fibula and tibia was found (3.3+/-2.4 degrees in the sagittal plane). The presented data are of interest as input for future biomechanical modelling and clinical decision making in particular, concerning joint fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17368465     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

Review 1.  The relation between geometry and function of the ankle joint complex: a biomechanical review.

Authors:  Roeland P Kleipool; Leendert Blankevoort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Neuromotor control of the lower limb in Achilles tendinopathy: implications for foot orthotic therapy.

Authors:  Narelle Wyndow; Sallie M Cowan; Tim V Wrigley; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Calcaneal adduction and eversion are coupled to talus and tibial rotation.

Authors:  Katina Mira Fischer; Steffen Willwacher; Anton Arndt; Gert-Peter Brüggemann
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 4.  Kinematics of the ankle and foot. In vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  A Lundberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

5.  Healthy ankle and hindfoot kinematics during gait: Sex differences, asymmetry and coupled motion revealed through dynamic biplane radiography.

Authors:  Shumeng Yang; Stephen P Canton; MaCalus V Hogan; William Anderst
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Foot kinematics in patients with two patterns of pathological plantar hyperkeratosis.

Authors:  Christopher J Nester; Peter Bowker; Andrew H Findlow
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Investigation of first ray mobility during gait by kinematic fluoroscopic imaging--a novel method.

Authors:  Heiner Martin; Ulf Bahlke; Albrecht Dietze; Volker Zschorlich; Klaus-Peter Schmitz; Thomas Mittlmeier
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Repeatability of a multi-segment foot model with a 15-marker set in healthy adults.

Authors:  Sang Gyo Seo; Dong Yeon Lee; Hyuk Ju Moon; Sung Ju Kim; Jihyeung Kim; Kyoung Min Lee; Chin Youb Chung; In Ho Choi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Lessons from dynamic cadaver and invasive bone pin studies: do we know how the foot really moves during gait?

Authors:  Christopher J Nester
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Reliability of clinically relevant 3D foot bone angles from quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  David J Gutekunst; Lu Liu; Tao Ju; Fred W Prior; David R Sinacore
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.