Literature DB >> 17368327

Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic.

Paul A Rosenberg1, Ketan G Amin, Yigal Zibari, Louis M Lin.   

Abstract

A randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic. Forty-eight patients with irreversible pulpitis requiring supplemental buccal infiltration for endodontic therapy were given either 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in a double-blind manner. A standard VAS pain scale was used to evaluate the patient's response to pain after a supplemental injection. The mean VAS score after supplemental anesthesia was 15.28 for 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 19.70 for 2% lidocaine with 1:00,000 epinephrine. The mean percentage change in VAS score was 70.5 and 62.2% for articaine and lidocaine, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the VAS pain score between 4% articaine with 1:00,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:00,000 epinephrine as a supplemental anesthetic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17368327     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  7 in total

1.  Infiltrative local anesthesia with articaine is equally as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine for the removal of erupted molars.

Authors:  J Venkat Narayanan; Prashanthi Gurram; Radhika Krishnan; Veerabahu Muthusubramanian; V Sadesh Kannan
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-05-25

2.  Anaesthetic Efficacy of Lidocaine and Articaine in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Combined with Buccal Infiltration in Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis.

Authors:  Shrimanikandan Ayappa Gandhi; Sambarta Das; Abhisek Das; Yoshaskam Agnihotri; Rajanna Venkatraman Mohan; Venkata Ramanan Dasu Subramanian
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

3.  Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine and 2% Lidocaine for Buccal Infiltration in Adult Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis of Maxillary First Molar: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Gufaran Ali Syed; Sanjyot A Mulay
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2022-03-23

Review 4.  Various strategies for pain-free root canal treatment.

Authors:  Masoud Parirokh; Paul V Abbott
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-12-24

5.  Efficacy of IANB and Gow-Gates Techniques in Mandibular Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Clinical Study.

Authors:  Jamileh Ghoddusi; Mohammad Hasan Zarrabi; Farzaneh Daneshvar; Neda Naghavi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2018

6.  Pulpal-anesthesia of a mandibular first molar with irreversible pulpitis by inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal infiltration using articaine or lignocaine.

Authors:  Nupur B Bhatnagar; Shivkumar P Mantri; Kavita A Dube; Neelam U Jaiswal; Vaishnavi J Singh
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2020-11-05

7.  The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Firas A Jamil; Huda Moutaz Asmael; Mohammed Yahya Al-Jarsha
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.757

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.