Literature DB >> 1736659

Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a need for universal screening in high prevalence populations?

H S Weinstock1, G A Bolan, R Kohn, C Balladares, A Back, G Oliva.   

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most prevalent sexually transmitted bacterial pathogen. Nevertheless, selective, rather than universal, screening for chlamydia has been recommended, largely because testing is expensive and requires considerable technical expertise. A total of 1,348 women in four family planning clinics in San Francisco, California, were screened from March 1987 to January 1988 to identify criteria for selective screening. Of these, 9.2% had a positive chlamydia test using direct fluorescence. Logistic regression analysis identified five factors associated with infection: age less than 25 years, cervical friability, single marital status, a new sexual partner within the past 3 months, and lack of barrier contraceptive use. No single risk factor or combination of risk factors had both a high sensitivity and a high positive predictive value for infection. While screening all women who were unmarried would detect 93% of those with chlamydia, the positive predictive value of 10.7% was not much higher than the overall prevalence. Conversely, screening all women with cervical friability, which had a positive predictive value of 23.2%, would only detect 11% of those with chlamydia. On the basis of the authors' findings, selective screening should not be used in high prevalence populations in which all women are at risk and should be screened for chlamydia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Distribution; Age Factors; Americas; Barrier Methods; Behavior; Biology; California; Cervix--changes; Chlamydia; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage; Data Analysis; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Diseases; Examinations And Diagnoses; Family Planning; Genitalia; Genitalia, Female; Infections; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Marital Status; North America; Northern America; Nuptiality; Physiology; Population; Population At Risk; Population Characteristics; Reproductive Tract Infections; Research Methodology; Risk Factors; Screening--standards; Sex Behavior; Sexually Transmitted Diseases; Statistical Regression; United States; Urogenital System; Uterus

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1736659     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  17 in total

1.  Use of ligase chain reaction with urine versus cervical culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in an asymptomatic military population of pregnant and nonpregnant females attending Papanicolaou smear clinics.

Authors:  C A Gaydos; M R Howell; T C Quinn; J C Gaydos; K T McKee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Detection of endocervical anti-Chlamydia trachomatis immunoglobulin A in pregnant women by a rapid, 6-minute enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: comparison with PCR and chlamydial antigen detection methods.

Authors:  S S Witkin; A M Bongiovanni; S R Inglis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  High prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women presenting in different clinical settings in Jamaica: implications for control strategies.

Authors:  G Dowe; M Smikle; S D King; H Wynter; J Frederick; T Hylton-Kong
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women based on mailed samples obtained at home: multipractice comparative study.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; J K Møller; B Andersen; F Olesen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-09

5.  Risk factors for genital chlamydial infection.

Authors:  Christine Navarro; Anne Jolly; Rama Nair; Yue Chen
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-05

6.  Screening for sexually transmitted diseases in rural women in Papua New Guinea: are WHO therapeutic algorithms appropriate for case detection?

Authors:  M Passey; C S Mgone; S Lupiwa; S Tiwara; T Lupiwa; M P Alpers
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Chlamydia trachomatis infection and associated risk factors in a low-income marginalized urban population in coastal Peru.

Authors:  Segundo R León; Kelika A Konda; Jeffrey D Klausner; Franca R Jones; Carlos F Cáceres; Thomas J Coates
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2009-07

Review 8.  General practice update: chlamydia infection in women.

Authors:  P Oakeshott; P Hay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Development and evaluation of screening strategies for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in an STD clinic.

Authors:  Y T van Duynhoven; M J van de Laar; J S Fennema; G J van Doornum; J A van den Hoek
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1995-12

10.  Applying a mixed-integer program to model re-screening women who test positive for C. trachomatis infection.

Authors:  Guoyu Tao; Bartholomew K Abban; Thomas L Gift; Guantao Chen; Kathleen L Irwin
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2004-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.