| Literature DB >> 17365883 |
Paul Brinckmann1, Burkhard Drerup, Thomas Kretschmer, Daniel Schulze-Frenking, Andre Wohlatz, Hans Henning Wetz.
Abstract
No other previously published studies consider the relative motion of orthotic components positioned on the upper arm and the forearm. This study therefore measured the location and direction of the axis of rotation of an orthotic component fixed to the forearm in relation to an orthotic component fixed to the upper arm, and compared the results with those obtained by palpation. A plane flexion or extension motion of the forearm component in relation to the component on the upper arm can be described as a pure rotation about a fixed centre. However, activation of the biceps or triceps shifts that centre by around 2 cm, due to a displacement of the humerus within the orthotic component on the upper arm. Within a range of approximately 1 cm, the location of the axis of rotation was similar to that obtained by palpation. Neither custom-made plastic/foam orthoses with their hinges aligned to the measured axis, nor orthoses with their hinges aligned to the palpated axis, exhibited any difference in the wearer's comfort. It is concluded that the best choice for the location of the axis of a hinge-type orthosis for the elbow constitutes a compromise between the axes for active flexion and active extension. In view of the large influence that muscle activation has on axis location, errors in the order of 1 cm seem to be negligible when adjusting the hinge of an orthosis in individual cases.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17365883 DOI: 10.1080/03093640600982354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prosthet Orthot Int ISSN: 0309-3646 Impact factor: 1.895