Literature DB >> 1736585

Superiority of nonpharmacologic therapy compared to propranolol and placebo in men with mild hypertension: a randomized, prospective trial.

J B Kostis1, R C Rosen, E Brondolo, L Taska, D E Smith, A C Wilson.   

Abstract

We compared the effects of nonpharmacologic therapy, propranolol monotherapy, and placebo on blood pressure, metabolic, exercise, and quality of life variables in a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 79 male patients with hypertension. A significant reduction in diastolic blood pressure was observed with both nondrug therapy (-8.0 +/- 1.08 mm Hg) and propranolol (-9.5 +/- 1.46 mm Hg) compared to placebo (-0.1 +/- 2.01 mm Hg). However, only patients receiving nonpharmacologic therapy showed a reduced body mass index, lower total and low-density lipoprotein serum cholesterol levels, and increased exercise tolerance compared to both propranolol and placebo. Patients receiving propranolol felt less anxious and unsure but showed a significant decrement in nocturnal penile tumescence compared to both placebo and nondrug therapy. Patients receiving nondrug therapy felt more energetic and reported improved sexual arousal and greater sexual satisfaction after treatment. Reductions in blood pressure in the nondrug treatment group were related to both weight reduction and improved fitness. We conclude that nondrug therapy is effective in controlling blood pressure in men with mild hypertension and is associated with improvements in weight, lipoprotein levels, and exercise tolerance compared to both propranolol and placebo. Quality of life assessments further support the use of nondrug therapy in this context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1736585     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90662-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  8 in total

Review 1.  Health-related quality-of-life measurement in hypertension. A review of randomised controlled drug trials.

Authors:  I Côté; J P Grégoire; J Moisan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  A review of the relationships between extreme obesity, quality of life, and sexual function.

Authors:  David B Sarwer; Megan Lavery; Jacqueline C Spitzer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Quality of life claims in trials of anti-hypertensive therapy.

Authors:  S M Hunt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Comparison of a lifestyle modification program with propranolol use in the management of diastolic hypertension.

Authors:  E J Pérez-Stable; T J Coates; R B Baron; B S Biró; W W Hauck; K S McHenry; P S Gardiner; D Feigal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Sexual sequelae of antihypertensive drugs: treatment effects on self-report and physiological measures in middle-aged male hypertensives.

Authors:  R C Rosen; J B Kostis; A Jekelis; L S Taska
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1994-04

6.  The antihypertensive efficacy of losartan and amlodipine assessed with office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Canadian Cozaar Hyzaar Amlodipine Trial Study Group.

Authors:  T W Wilson; Y Lacourcière; C C Barnes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-09-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Obesity and Sexual Functioning.

Authors:  David B Sarwer; Alexis J Hanson; Jessica Voeller; Kristine Steffen
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2018-12

8.  Effects of Major Antihypertensive Drug Classes on Erectile Function: a Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis T Farmakis; Nikolaos Pyrgidis; Ioannis Doundoulakis; Ioannis Mykoniatis; Evangelos Akrivos; George Giannakoulas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.947

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.