Literature DB >> 17365527

Effect of stroke rate on the distribution of net mechanical power in rowing.

Mathijs J Hofmijster1, Erik H J Landman, Richard M Smith, A J Knoek Van Soest.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of manipulating stroke rate on the distribution of mechanical power in rowing. Two causes of inefficient mechanical energy expenditure were identified in rowing. The ratio between power not lost at the blades and generated mechanical power (P(rower)) and the ratio between power not lost to velocity fluctuations and P(rower) were used to quantify efficiency (e(propelling) and e(velocity) respectively). Subsequently, the fraction of P(rower) that contributes to the average velocity (chi(boat)) was calculated (e(net)). For nine participants, stroke rate was manipulated between 20 and 36 strokes per minute to examine the effect on the power flow. The data were analysed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results indicated that at higher stroke rates, P(rower), chi(boat), e(propelling), and e(net) increase, whereas e(velocity) decreases (P < 0.0001). The decrease in e(velocity) can be explained by a larger impulse exchange between rower and boat. The increase in e(propelling) can be explained because the work at the blades decreases, which in turn can be explained by a change in blade kinematics. The increase in e(net) results because the increase in e(propelling) is higher than the decrease in e(velocity). Our results show that the power equation is an adequate conceptual model with which to analyse rowing performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17365527     DOI: 10.1080/02640410600718046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  12 in total

Review 1.  Strength testing and training of rowers: a review.

Authors:  Trent W Lawton; John B Cronin; Michael R McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Over 50 Years of Researching Force Profiles in Rowing: What Do We Know?

Authors:  John Warmenhoven; Stephen Cobley; Conny Draper; Richard Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Oxford and Cambridge Boat Race: Performance, Pacing and Tactics Between 1890 and 2014.

Authors:  Andrew M Edwards; Joshua H Guy; Florentina J Hettinga
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Rowing Crew Coordination Dynamics at Increasing Stroke Rates.

Authors:  Laura S Cuijpers; Frank T J M Zaal; Harjo J de Poel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Interpersonal Coordination and Individual Organization Combined with Shared Phenomenological Experience in Rowing Performance: Two Case Studies.

Authors:  Ludovic Seifert; Julien Lardy; Jérôme Bourbousson; David Adé; Antoine Nordez; Régis Thouvarecq; Jacques Saury
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-30

6.  Technical Determinants of On-Water Rowing Performance.

Authors:  Ana C Holt; Robert J Aughey; Kevin Ball; William G Hopkins; Rodney Siegel
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-12-03

7.  Case Report: Adjusting Seat and Backrest Angle Improves Performance in an Elite Paralympic Rower.

Authors:  Anna Cecilia Severin; Jørgen Danielsen; Jørgen Falck Erichsen; Sindre Wold Eikevåg; Martin Steinert; Gertjan Ettema; Julia Kathrin Baumgart
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-02-11

8.  World and European Rowing Medallists Pace With Smaller Variation Than Their Competitors.

Authors:  Fredrik Mentzoni; Thomas Losnegard
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-12-22

9.  Don't rock the boat: how antiphase crew coordination affects rowing.

Authors:  Anouk J de Brouwer; Harjo J de Poel; Mathijs J Hofmijster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Optimal stride frequencies in running at different speeds.

Authors:  Ben T van Oeveren; Cornelis J de Ruiter; Peter J Beek; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.