Literature DB >> 17365068

The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): test-retest reliability study.

Sharon Cameron1, Harvey Dillon.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to collect data on the Listening in Spatialized Noise - Sentences Test (LISN-S(R); Cameron & Dillon, 2006) from a group of children with normal hearing, over two test sessions, to determine test-retest reliability. The LISN-S produces a three-dimensional auditory environment under headphones, and is presented using a personal computer. Speech reception threshold (SRT) is determined for target sentences presented in competing speech that is manipulated in respect to location (0 degrees versus+/-90 degrees azimuth) and/or the vocal identity of the speaker/s of the stories (same as, or different to, the speaker of the target sentences). Forty-six children aged five to eleven years took part in the study. Mean changes in performance on retest on the LISN-S conditions and advantage measures ranged from 0.1 dB to 1.1 dB. Reliability (r) ranged from 0.3 to 0.8. All correlations were significant (p < 0.05). Across the range of performance measures, critical differences for test score improvements ranged from 2.5 dB to 4.4 dB, making this test suitable for detecting improvements in performance in an individual child diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder following a period of auditory compensation (such as an FM system), or training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17365068     DOI: 10.1080/14992020601164170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  9 in total

1.  Results from a National Central Auditory Processing Disorder Service: A Real-World Assessment of Diagnostic Practices and Remediation for Central Auditory Processing Disorder.

Authors:  Sharon Cameron; Helen Glyde; Harvey Dillon; Alison King; Karin Gillies
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

2.  Relation between Working Memory Capacity and Auditory Stream Segregation in Children with Auditory Processing Disorder.

Authors:  Yones Lotfi; Saiedeh Mehrkian; Abdollah Moossavi; Soghrat Faghih Zadeh; Hamed Sadjedi
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2016-03

3.  Use of Questionnaire-Based Measures in the Assessment of Listening Difficulties in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Johanna G Barry; Danielle Tomlin; David R Moore; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  On the Etiology of Listening Difficulties in Noise Despite Clinically Normal Audiograms.

Authors:  Martin Pienkowski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Comorbidity of Auditory Processing, Attention, and Memory in Children With Word Reading Difficulties.

Authors:  Rakshita Gokula; Mridula Sharma; Linda Cupples; Joaquin T Valderrama
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-22

6.  Peripheral Auditory Involvement in Childhood Listening Difficulty.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Li Lin; Nicholette T Sloat; Audrey Perdew; Hannah Stewart; David R Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 7.  Efficacy of the LiSN & Learn auditory training software: randomized blinded controlled study.

Authors:  Sharon Cameron; Helen Glyde; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2012-09-18

8.  Spatial Release From Masking in 2-Year-Olds With Normal Hearing and With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Christi L Hess; Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Same or Different: The Overlap Between Children With Auditory Processing Disorders and Children With Other Developmental Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ellen de Wit; Pim van Dijk; Sandra Hanekamp; Margot I Visser-Bochane; Bert Steenbergen; Cees P van der Schans; Margreet R Luinge
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.