Literature DB >> 1736506

Twelve-month comparison of two treatments for erectile dysfunction: self-injection versus external vacuum devices.

L A Turner1, S E Althof, S B Levine, D R Bodner, E D Kursh, M I Resnick.   

Abstract

This study directly compared two nonsurgical treatments for erectile dysfunction, self-injection of papaverine/phentolamine and external vacuum devices, in terms of usage rates, effectiveness, side effects, dropout rates, and impact on patient sexual and psychologic functioning. Both alternatives were regularly, successfully, and safely used by patients, though dropout rates were higher for self-injection. Both produced erections of improved quality, and effected sustained improvements in frequency of intercourse, orgasm, and sexual satisfaction. Spontaneous erections also improved with both treatments. General psychiatric symptomatology was decreased, and anxiety was improved. There were no differences between the two treatments in sexual or psychologic impact. Relative contraindications and esthetic considerations are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1736506     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(92)90270-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  Managing impotence in diabetes.

Authors:  D E Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-31

Review 2.  External vacuum therapy for erectile dysfunction: use and results.

Authors:  R W Lewis; R Witherington
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Health-related quality of life in men with erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  M S Litwin; R J Nied; N Dhanani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Indications and characteristics of penile traction and vacuum erection devices.

Authors:  Abida Sultana; Peter Grice; Josip Vukina; Ian Pearce; Vaibhav Modgil
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Efficacy of vacuum erectile devices (VEDs) after radical prostatectomy: the initial Irish experience of a dedicated VED clinic.

Authors:  G J Nason; F McNamara; M Twyford; F O'Kelly; S White; E Dunne; G C Durkan; S K Giri; G P Smyth; R E Power
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 6.  Men's beliefs about treatment for erectile dysfunction-what influences treatment use? A systematic review.

Authors:  Paul Williams; Hayley McBain; Aliya Amirova; Stanton Newman; Kathleen Mulligan
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 7.  Management of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C D Zippe; R Raina; M Thukral; M M Lakin; E A Klein; A Agarwal
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.862

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.