Literature DB >> 17364536

Holo-analysis of the efficacy of Bio-Mos in broiler nutrition.

G D Rosen1.   

Abstract

1. This first holo-analysis of the efficacy in broiler nutrition of the saccharide product, Bio-Mos(R) (BM), is part of a comprehensive empirical modelling research programme quantifying and comparing the efficacies and future research needs of the diverse candidates offered as replacements for antibiotics. 2. The data used are from 32 publications with broiler performance data from a world-wide literature collection of 124 (1997-2003) on the use of BM as a broiler feed additive. It contains the results of 82 negatively controlled feeding tests from 21 countries using a total of 85 142 broilers, averaging 401 per treatment. 3. The 82 feed intake, liveweight gain, feed conversion ratio and 44 mortality responses to BM average -12.2 g, 27.6 g, -0.0391 and 0.0311%, respectively, with coefficients of variation of 828, 227, 192 and 8392%. Respective beneficial response frequencies for gain, conversion and mortality are 65, 70 (52% jointly) and 52%. 4. Holo-analytical multiple regression models were elaborated for the effects of BM on feed intake, liveweight gain, feed conversion ratio and mortality, using conventional P<or=0.05 in/P>or=0.10 out and less stringent P<or=0.25 in/P>or=0.34 out partial regression coefficient standards, with and without>or=3xroot mean square error outliers, in order to quantify the influences of negative control performance, test duration, BM dosage, cage housing, processed feed, antibiotic feed, year of test and USA test. To date they account for only 5-36% of response variations, due primarily to 52 of the 82 tests having no reported feed formulations. 5. These exploratory models confirm beneficial responses to BM for current broiler performance levels. They also indicate a need to clarify BM dose-response relationships in order to maximise efficient use in praxis and to facilitate cogent comparisons with other pronutrients, including other saccharide products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17364536     DOI: 10.1080/00071660601050755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial fermentation in the gastrointestinal tract of non-ruminants: influence of fermented feeds and fermentable carbohydrates.

Authors:  A T Niba; J D Beal; A C Kudi; P H Brooks
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Combination of an Enzymatically Hydrolyzed Yeast and Yeast Culture with a Direct-fed Microbial in the Feeds of Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  S Gómez; M L Angeles; M C Mojica; S Jalukar
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Comparison of antibiotic supplementation versus a yeast-based prebiotic on the cecal microbiome of commercial broilers.

Authors:  Si Hong Park; Sang In Lee; Sun Ae Kim; Karen Christensen; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  An Introduction to the Avian Gut Microbiota and the Effects of Yeast-Based Prebiotic-Type Compounds as Potential Feed Additives.

Authors:  Stephanie M Roto; Peter M Rubinelli; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-09-02

5.  Ameliorative Effects of Antibiotic-, Probiotic- and Phytobiotic-Supplemented Diets on the Performance, Intestinal Health, Carcass Traits, and Meat Quality of Clostridium perfringens-Infected Broilers.

Authors:  Elsayed O S Hussein; Shamseldein H Ahmed; Alaeldein M Abudabos; Gamaleldin M Suliman; Mohamed E Abd El-Hack; Ayman A Swelum; Abdullah N Alowaimer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Dietary Mannan Oligosaccharides Modulate Gut Inflammatory Response and Improve Duodenal Villi Height in Post-Weaning Piglets Improving Feed Efficiency.

Authors:  Alessandro Agazzi; Vera Perricone; Fabio Omodei Zorini; Silvia Sandrini; Elena Mariani; Xian-Ren Jiang; Alessandra Ferrari; Maurizio Crestani; Thi Xuan Nguyen; Valentino Bontempo; Cinzia Domeneghini; Giovanni Savoini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.