Literature DB >> 17364185

Removal of ocular artifacts from the EEG: a comparison between time-domain regression method and adaptive filtering method using simulated data.

Ping He1, Glenn Wilson, Christopher Russell, Maria Gerschutz.   

Abstract

We recently proposed an adaptive filtering (AF) method for removing ocular artifacts from EEG recordings. The method employs two parameters: the forgetting factor lambda and the filter length M. In this paper, we first show that when lambda = M = 1, the adaptive filtering method becomes equivalent to the widely used time-domain regression method. The role of lambda (when less than one) is to deal with the possible non-stationary relationship between the reference EOG and the EOG component in the EEG. To demonstrate the role of M, a simulation study is carried out that quantitatively evaluates the accuracy of the adaptive filtering method under different conditions and comparing with the accuracy of the regression method. The results show that when there is a shape difference or a misalignment between the reference EOG and the EOG artifact in the EEG, the adaptive filtering method can be more accurate in recovering the true EEG by using an M larger than one (e.g. M = 2 or 3).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17364185     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-007-0179-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   3.079


  13 in total

Review 1.  Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review.

Authors:  R J Croft; R J Barry
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.734

2.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects.

Authors:  T P Jung; S Makeig; M Westerfield; J Townsend; E Courchesne; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Automatic correction of ocular artifacts in the EEG: a comparison of regression-based and component-based methods.

Authors:  Garrick L Wallstrom; Robert E Kass; Anita Miller; Jeffrey F Cohn; Nathan A Fox
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Removal of eye blinking artifact from the electro-encephalogram, incorporating a new constrained blind source separation algorithm.

Authors:  L Shoker; S Sanei; W Wang; J A Chambers
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Removal of the ocular artifact from the EEG: a comparison of time and frequency domain methods with simulated and real data.

Authors:  J L Kenemans; P C Molenaar; M N Verbaten; J L Slangen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  The transfer of EOG activity into the EEG for eyes open and closed.

Authors:  T Gasser; L Sroka; J Möcks
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-08

7.  Spatial filtering of multichannel electroencephalographic recordings through principal component analysis by singular value decomposition.

Authors:  T D Lagerlund; F W Sharbrough; N E Busacker
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.177

8.  Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event-related potentials. II: Source dipoles and source components.

Authors:  O G Lins; T W Picton; P Berg; M Scherg
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain.

Authors:  J C Woestenburg; M N Verbaten; J L Slangen
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1983 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 3.251

10.  A spectral method for removing eye movement artifacts from the EEG.

Authors:  J L Whitton; F Lue; H Moldofsky
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-06
View more
  7 in total

1.  A new combination: scale-space filtering of projected brain activities.

Authors:  Serap Aydin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Tikhonov regularized solutions for improvement of signal-to-noise ratio in case of auditory-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Serap Aydin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Comparative Study of Wavelet-Based Unsupervised Ocular Artifact Removal Techniques for Single-Channel EEG Data.

Authors:  Saleha Khatun; Ruhi Mahajan; Bashir I Morshed
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.316

4.  Wavelet-based artifact identification and separation technique for EEG signals during galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Mani Adib; Edmond Cretu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.238

5.  Electrode replacement does not affect classification accuracy in dual-session use of a passive brain-computer interface for assessing cognitive workload.

Authors:  Justin R Estepp; James C Christensen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Design of an Adaptive Human-Machine System Based on Dynamical Pattern Recognition of Cognitive Task-Load.

Authors:  Jianhua Zhang; Zhong Yin; Rubin Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Common Methodology for Cardiac and Ocular Artifact Suppression from EEG Recordings by Combining Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Regression Approach.

Authors:  Rajesh Patel; K Gireesan; S Sengottuvel; M P Janawadkar; T S Radhakrishnan
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 1.553

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.