RATIONALE: Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy is highly sensitive for pulmonary embolism (PE), but its clinical usefulness is limited by its nondiagnostic rate. Objective analysis of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) three-dimensional scintigraphy may improve its diagnostic performance compared with subjective interpretation. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of objective SPECT analysis in PE. METHODS: We determined the ventilation/perfusion (V(.)/Q(.)) relationship using SPECT scintigraphy in a retrospective cohort of 73 patients. Measures of V(.)/Q(.) heterogeneity (logSD(Q(.)), logSD(V(.)), logSD(VQR)), including a novel parameter, the weighted median V(.)/Q(.) value, were calculated. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, each parameter's diagnostic accuracy was determined. The weighted median V(.)/Q(.) value was then assessed prospectively in a second cohort of 50 patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In cohort 1, all parameters of V(.)/Q(.) heterogeneity were higher in patients with PE (p < 0.002). The weighted median V(.)/Q(.) had the highest area under the ROC curve (0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.98). When applied to the prospective cohort, the area under the ROC curve was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.99), with diagnostic cutoff values having negative and positive predictive values of 96 and 83%, respectively. In the retrospective and prospective cohorts, 82 and 73% of initially reported intermediate or low probability scans had diagnostic weighted median V(.)/Q(.) values, with 90 and 100% accuracy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Objective analysis of SPECT scintigraphy has a high diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected PE. Objective analysis has the potential to reduce the number of nondiagnostic scan results, and may be useful for quantifying V(.)/Q(.) mismatch in other pulmonary disorders.
RATIONALE: Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy is highly sensitive for pulmonary embolism (PE), but its clinical usefulness is limited by its nondiagnostic rate. Objective analysis of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) three-dimensional scintigraphy may improve its diagnostic performance compared with subjective interpretation. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of objective SPECT analysis in PE. METHODS: We determined the ventilation/perfusion (V(.)/Q(.)) relationship using SPECT scintigraphy in a retrospective cohort of 73 patients. Measures of V(.)/Q(.) heterogeneity (logSD(Q(.)), logSD(V(.)), logSD(VQR)), including a novel parameter, the weighted median V(.)/Q(.) value, were calculated. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, each parameter's diagnostic accuracy was determined. The weighted median V(.)/Q(.) value was then assessed prospectively in a second cohort of 50 patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In cohort 1, all parameters of V(.)/Q(.) heterogeneity were higher in patients with PE (p < 0.002). The weighted median V(.)/Q(.) had the highest area under the ROC curve (0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.98). When applied to the prospective cohort, the area under the ROC curve was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.99), with diagnostic cutoff values having negative and positive predictive values of 96 and 83%, respectively. In the retrospective and prospective cohorts, 82 and 73% of initially reported intermediate or low probability scans had diagnostic weighted median V(.)/Q(.) values, with 90 and 100% accuracy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Objective analysis of SPECT scintigraphy has a high diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected PE. Objective analysis has the potential to reduce the number of nondiagnostic scan results, and may be useful for quantifying V(.)/Q(.) mismatch in other pulmonary disorders.
Authors: John H Reid; Emmanuel E Coche; Tomio Inoue; Edmund E Kim; Maurizio Dondi; Naoyuki Watanabe; Giuliano Mariani Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Catherine E Farrow; Cheryl M Salome; Benjamin E Harris; Dale L Bailey; Elizabeth Bailey; Norbert Berend; Iven H Young; Gregory G King Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-07-26
Authors: Zhuorui Li; Pierre-Yves Le Roux; Jason Callahan; Nicholas Hardcastle; Michael S Hofman; Shankar Siva; Tokihiro Yamamoto Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-04-11
Authors: Pernilla Norberg; Hans Lennart Persson; Gudrun Alm Carlsson; Björn Bake; Magnus Kentson; Michael Sandborg; Agnetha Gustafsson Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2013-04-19 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Geoffrey G Zhang; Kujtim Latifi; Kaifang Du; Joseph M Reinhardt; Gary E Christensen; Kai Ding; Vladimir Feygelman; Eduardo G Moros Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 2.102