Literature DB >> 17363718

Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and the risk of new vascular events in patients with manifest arterial disease: the SMART study.

Bertine M B Goessens1, Frank L J Visseren, L Jaap Kappelle, Ale Algra, Yolanda van der Graaf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The frequency of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (CAS) increases with age from 0.5% in individuals below 50 years of age to 5% to 10% in individuals over 65 years of age in the general population. Its prognostic value has been examined in the general population but less often in patients with clinical manifestations of arterial disease other than retinal or cerebral ischemia. We examined the relationship between asymptomatic CAS and the risk of subsequent events in this specific group of patients.
METHODS: This study involved 2684 consecutive patients with clinical manifestations of arterial disease or type 2 diabetes mellitus, but without a history of cerebral ischemia, enrolled in the SMART study (Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease). The degree of asymptomatic CAS was assessed with Duplex scanning and defined on the basis of the blood flow velocity patterns at baseline in both carotid arteries. None of the patients underwent carotid endarterectomy or endovascular intervention. During the follow-up period, vascular events (vascular death, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction) were documented in detail. Data were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards regression and adjusted for age, gender, and classic vascular risk factors.
RESULTS: Asymptomatic CAS of 50% or greater was present in 221 (8%) patients. During a mean follow up of 3.6 years (SD=2.3), a first vascular event occurred in 253 patients (9%). The cumulative incidence rate for the composite of subsequent vascular events after 5 years was 12.3% (95% CI=10.7 to 13.9), for cerebral infarction 2.2% (95% CI=1.4 to 2.8), and for myocardial infarction 8.0% (95% CI=6.6 to 9.4). Adjusted for age and gender, asymptomatic CAS of 50% or greater was related to a higher risk of subsequent vascular events (hazard ratio=1.5, 95% CI=1.1 to 2.1), in particular of vascular death (hazard ratio=1.8, 95% CI=1.2 to 2.6). After additional adjustment for vascular risk factors, the hazard ratios remained essentially the same.
CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is an independent predictor of vascular events, especially vascular death, in patients with clinical manifestations of arterial disease or type 2 diabetes but without a history of cerebral ischemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17363718     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.477091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  38 in total

Review 1.  Interventional management of asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Vincent V Truong; Alex Abou-Chebl
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Optimal treatment of extracranial carotid artery disease: carotid endarterectomy, carotid stenting, or optimal medical therapy.

Authors:  R Kevin Rogers; Kalkidan Bishu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Carotid endarterectomy should not be based on consensus statement duplex velocity criteria.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Bjoern D Suckow; Claire L Griffin; Jack L Cronenwett; Philip P Goodney; Timothy G Lukovits; Robert M Zwolak; Mark F Fillinger
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Assessment of intracranial arterial stenosis with multidetector row CT angiography: a postprocessing techniques comparison.

Authors:  L Saba; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; G Mallarini
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Time to rethink management strategies in asymptomatic carotid artery disease.

Authors:  A Ross Naylor
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  The Risk of Stroke and TIA in Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  N Singh; M Marko; J M Ospel; M Goyal; M Almekhlafi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Carotid stenting vs endarterectomy: new results in perspective.

Authors:  William J Perkins; Guiseppe Lanzino; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: immediate revascularization or watchful waiting?

Authors:  Sridhar Venkatachalam
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance carotid plaque imaging for primary stroke prevention in Canada.

Authors:  Eli Lechtman; Indranil Balki; Kiersten Thomas; Kevin Chen; Alan R Moody; Pascal N Tyrrell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Expression of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) in carotid artery plaques predicts long-term cardiac outcome.

Authors:  Joerg Herrmann; Dallit Mannheim; Christine Wohlert; Daniele Versari; Fredric B Meyer; Joseph P McConnell; Mario Gössl; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.