Literature DB >> 1736344

Reliability of in situ measurements of colorectal polyps.

B Hofstad1, M Vatn, S Larsen, M Osnes.   

Abstract

A reliable and sensitive in situ method for measuring polyp size is fundamental for growth studies of colonic polyps. A measuring probe inserted through a colonoscope can give a visual assessment of polyp diameter, and from a picture of the polyp the area of the polyp on the picture can be calculated by computerized analysis. To test the reliability and sensitivity of these two in situ measurements, 43 colonic polyps (mean diameter, 8.5 mm; range, 4-20 mm) removed by snare diathermy resection were examined. The maximal diameter was measured, and two Polaroid pictures taken of each polyp. After polypectomy each polyp was subjected to extracorporeal reassessment of diameter and measurement of weight and volume. By computerized analysis of the pictures the following variables were estimated: 1) area of the polyp on the picture; 2) largest diameter; 3) maximum width 90 degrees on the largest diameter; 4) maximum distance from centre of gravity; and 5) minimum distance from centre of gravity. Results showed good correlation between diameter measured in situ and after removal (r = 0.93), diameter raised to the 3rd power and weight (r = 0.93), and also to volume (r = 0.77). Area analysis compared with weight was less good (r = 0.72). A very high correlation was demonstrated between weight and volume (r = 0.99). We conclude that the measurement of diameter in situ with a measuring probe is sensitive and somewhat more reliable than computerized analysis of size. The present 3-year follow-up and intervention study will show which of the two methods is preferable for evaluation of polyp growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1736344     DOI: 10.3109/00365529209011168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  5 in total

1.  Endoscopic imaging and size estimation of colorectal adenomas in the multiple intestinal neoplasia mouse.

Authors:  Harvey H Hensley; Carrie E Merkel; Wen-Chi L Chang; Karthik Devarajan; Harry S Cooper; Margie L Clapper
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years.

Authors:  B Hofstad; M H Vatn; S N Andersen; H S Huitfeldt; T Rognum; S Larsen; M Osnes
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Does a family history of cancer increase the risk of occurrence, growth, and recurrence of colorectal adenomas?

Authors:  K Almendingen; B Hofstad; M H Vatn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Secretory component mRNA and protein expression in colorectal adenomas and carcinomas.

Authors:  P Krajci; G I Meling; S N Andersen; B Hofstad; M H Vatn; T O Rognum; P Brandtzaeg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Mis-sizing of Adenomatous Polyps is Common among Endoscopists and Impacts Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendations.

Authors:  Thu Pham; Aung Bajaj; Lorela Berberi; Chengcheng Hu; Sasha Taleban
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-06-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.