Literature DB >> 17363319

Rasch analysis of three versions of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.

Megan Davidson1.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to explore the construct validity of three versions of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire for low back pain using Rasch analysis. The three versions of the ODQ share 9 items and differ on one other. About 100 patients with non-specific low back pain seeking physiotherapy treatment at hospital outpatient departments and physiotherapy private practices completed the 12 Oswestry items as part of a battery of questionnaires. Rasch analysis revealed that four items (Personal Care, Standing, Sex Life and Social Life) had disordered response thresholds and one item (Walking) showed differential item functioning by age. The 10 standard Oswestry items and a modified version in which Sex Life is replaced by Work/Housework showed adequate overall fit to the Rasch model (chi(2)P>.01). The third version, in which Sex Life is replaced by Changing Degree of Pain, did not fit the model (chi(2)P=.006) and the Changing Degree of Pain item was misfitting (residual 2.34, P=.007). These findings suggest that either of the first two of the three versions of this widely used low back pain outcome measure should be selected over the third. Users should also be aware that for some items the rating scale steps do not perform as intended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17363319     DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2007.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  10 in total

1.  Temporomandibular joint effusion and its relationship with perceived disability assessed using musculoskeletal ultrasound and a patient-reported disability index.

Authors:  Katie Johnston; Lance Bird; Phillip Bright
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-02-05

2.  Metastatic cancer mimicking mechanical low back pain: a case report.

Authors:  Lance M Mabry; Michael D Ross; John M Tonarelli
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-08

3.  Fear-avoidance beliefs are associated with disability in older American adults with low back pain.

Authors:  J Megan Sions; Gregory E Hicks
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-02-24

4.  Quantitative sensory testing changes in the successful management of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Benjamin J Geletka; Michael A O'Hearn; Carol A Courtney
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-02

5.  Specific treatment of problems of the spine (STOPS): design of a randomised controlled trial comparing specific physiotherapy versus advice for people with subacute low back disorders.

Authors:  Andrew J Hahne; Jon J Ford; Luke D Surkitt; Matthew C Richards; Alexander Y P Chan; Sarah L Thompson; Rana S Hinman; Nicholas F Taylor
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: listening to Australian women.

Authors:  Heather Pierce; Caroline S E Homer; Hannah G Dahlen; Jenny King
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2012-05-23

7.  Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Objective Measurement Scales and Ambulatory Status.

Authors:  Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar; Owoicho Adogwa; Ankit I Mehta
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-07-27

8.  Effects of lumbar extensor muscle strengthening and neuromuscular control retraining on disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Joshua Brodie Farragher; Adrian Pranata; Gavin Williams; Doa El-Ansary; Selina M Parry; Jessica Kasza; Adam Bryant
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Understanding how individualised physiotherapy or advice altered different elements of disability for people with low back pain using network analysis.

Authors:  Bernard X W Liew; Jon J Ford; Giovanni Briganti; Andrew J Hahne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Measurement precision of the disability for back pain scale-by applying Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Yen-Mou Lu; Yuh-Yih Wu; Ching-Lin Hsieh; Chih-Lung Lin; Shiuh-Lin Hwang; Kuang-I Cheng; Yi-Jing Lue
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.186

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.