Anders Holsgaard Larsen1, Lis Puggaard, Ulpu Hämäläinen, Per Aagaard. 1. Centre of Applied and Clinical Exercise Sciences, Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark. ahlarsen@health.sdu.dk
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Stair walking is a demanding task in old age. Ground reaction force (GRF) analysis, relative EMG activation, and muscular coactivation were performed during stair walking. The aim was to investigate the ageing effect on GRF distribution and muscle antagonist coactivation during stair walking, at varied speed. During ascending at maximal velocity old subjects demonstrated reduced GRF in all examined phases (range: 28-35%), whereas muscle coactivation only was elevated for the Entire stance phase (18.5%). GRF parameters during ascent and descent at freely chosen speed demonstrated differences between age groups (5-28%). Furthermore, muscle coactivation was elevated in old subjects (e.g. Entire stance phase (17-19%)) along with greater EMG activation in all muscles (16-65%). At standardized gait velocity only minor differences in GRF were observed between age groups. However, elderly subjects showed elevated muscular coactivation (e.g. loading phase and entire stance phase (18-22%)) along with greater EMG activation (35-66%). CONCLUSIONS: Differences between age groups in neuromotor and kinetic stair walking strategy do not depend upon the age-related decline in velocity alone, but rather reflect a uniform alteration. This needs to be considered during rehabilitation and/or clinical settings at old age.
UNLABELLED: Stair walking is a demanding task in old age. Ground reaction force (GRF) analysis, relative EMG activation, and muscular coactivation were performed during stair walking. The aim was to investigate the ageing effect on GRF distribution and muscle antagonist coactivation during stair walking, at varied speed. During ascending at maximal velocity old subjects demonstrated reduced GRF in all examined phases (range: 28-35%), whereas muscle coactivation only was elevated for the Entire stance phase (18.5%). GRF parameters during ascent and descent at freely chosen speed demonstrated differences between age groups (5-28%). Furthermore, muscle coactivation was elevated in old subjects (e.g. Entire stance phase (17-19%)) along with greater EMG activation in all muscles (16-65%). At standardized gait velocity only minor differences in GRF were observed between age groups. However, elderly subjects showed elevated muscular coactivation (e.g. loading phase and entire stance phase (18-22%)) along with greater EMG activation (35-66%). CONCLUSIONS: Differences between age groups in neuromotor and kinetic stair walking strategy do not depend upon the age-related decline in velocity alone, but rather reflect a uniform alteration. This needs to be considered during rehabilitation and/or clinical settings at old age.
Authors: Christopher J Arellano; David Caha; Joseph E Hennessey; Ioannis G Amiridis; Stéphane Baudry; Roger M Enoka Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2016-02-04
Authors: Bo Hu; Søren Thorgaard Skou; Barton L Wise; Glenn N Williams; Michael C Nevitt; Neil A Segal Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Tibor Hortobágyi; Adria Finch; Stanislaw Solnik; Patrick Rider; Paul DeVita Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jacqueline Louise Mair; Luca Laudani; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Giuseppe De Vito; Colin Boreham; Andrea Macaluso Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Emil Sundstrup; Markus Due Jakobsen; Lars Louis Andersen; Thomas Rostgaard Andersen; Morten Bredsgaard Randers; Jørn Wulff Helge; Charlotte Suetta; Jakob Friis Schmidt; Jens Bangsbo; Peter Krustrup; Per Aagaard Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Brecca M M Gaffney; Cory L Christiansen; Amanda M Murray; Bradley S Davidson Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 2.368