Literature DB >> 17362810

Moxifloxacin vs amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute sinusitis.

José R Arrieta1, Alejandro S Galgano, Eulalia Sakano, Ximena Fonseca, Carlos F Amábile-Cuevas, Gerardo Hernández-Oliva, Raul Vivar, Gerardo González, Arturo Torres.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin with that of amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis in adults.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred seventy-five patients from Latin American countries were randomized to receive oral moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily for 7 days, or oral amoxicillin/clavulanate 500/125 mg 3 times daily for 10 days, in a prospective, open study.
RESULTS: At the test-of-cure visit (7-14 days after the end of therapy), the clinical success rate in the moxifloxacin group was 93.4% similar to that in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group (92.7%). Documented bacteriological eradication plus presumed eradication rates in the moxifloxacin (96.5%) and the amoxicillin/clavulanate (96.7%) groups were also similar. Drug-related adverse events were recorded in 32.2% of patients in the moxifloxacin group and 29.7% in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group. Patient discontinuation in the trial due to adverse events occurred for 10 patients in the moxifloxacin group and 6 in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, in terms of clinical and bacteriological response, moxifloxacin was equivalent to amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17362810     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0196-0709            Impact factor:   1.808


  6 in total

Review 1.  Fluoroquinolones compared with beta-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Konstantina P Giannopoulou; Alexandros P Grammatikos; George Dimopoulos; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Martin Desrosiers; Gerald A Evans; Paul K Keith; Erin D Wright; Alan Kaplan; Jacques Bouchard; Anthony Ciavarella; Patrick W Doyle; Amin R Javer; Eric S Leith; Atreyi Mukherji; R Robert Schellenberg; Peter Small; Ian J Witterick
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.406

Review 3.  The prevalence of bacterial infection in acute rhinosinusitis: a Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie S Smith; Elisabeth H Ference; Charlesnika T Evans; Bruce K Tan; Robert C Kern; Rakesh K Chandra
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Safety profile of the respiratory fluoroquinolone moxifloxacin: comparison with other fluoroquinolones and other antibacterial classes.

Authors:  Françoise Van Bambeke; Paul M Tulkens
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Gender analysis of moxifloxacin clinical trials.

Authors:  Elisa Chilet-Rosell; Ma Teresa Ruiz-Cantero; Ma Angeles Pardo
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Characterisation of patients receiving moxifloxacin for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in clinical practice: results from an international, observational cohort study.

Authors:  Ralph Mösges; Martin Desrosiers; Pierre Arvis; Stephanie Heldner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.