Literature DB >> 17362682

Management of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Tudor G Jovin1, Rishi Gupta, Michael B Horowitz.   

Abstract

Recently completed prospective studies have shown that with an incidence of recurrent stroke of approximately 10% per year, significant mortality, and other vascular comorbidities, symptomatic intracranial stenosis is a marker of aggressive vascular disease. Although strict control of atherosclerotic risk factors and antithrombotic therapy preferably with antiplatelet agents should be the mainstay of treatment for every patient with this disease, some patients are likely to remain refractory to medical therapy. These high-risk patients appear to be individuals with recent symptoms and severe (> 70%) stenosis with clinical and imaging evidence of hemodynamic impairment distal to the stenotic artery. Advances in balloon and stent technology have made consideration of these high-risk patients for endovascular management with angioplasty and stenting possible, which should ideally take place as part of randomized clinical trials, because the benefit of these high-risk therapies compared with medical therapy is not yet established. This article reviews available medical treatment options for symptomatic intracranial disease and outlines the current state of endovascular therapy for this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17362682     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-007-0007-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  62 in total

1.  Impact of metabolic syndrome on prognosis of symptomatic intracranial atherostenosis.

Authors:  Bruce Ovbiagele; Jeffrey L Saver; Michael J Lynn; Marc Chimowitz
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Pierre Amarenco; Julien Bogousslavsky; Alfred Callahan; Larry B Goldstein; Michael Hennerici; Amy E Rudolph; Henrik Sillesen; Lisa Simunovic; Michael Szarek; K M A Welch; Justin A Zivin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Perforator stroke after elective stenting of symptomatic intracranial stenosis.

Authors:  W J Jiang; T Srivastava; F Gao; B Du; K H Dong; X T Xu
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Cerebral hemodynamic impairment: methods of measurement and association with stroke risk.

Authors:  C P Derdeyn; R L Grubb; W J Powers
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-07-22       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Stenting of Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Vertebral or Intracranial Arteries (SSYLVIA): study results.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  The prognosis of carotid siphon stenosis.

Authors:  L R Wechsler; J P Kistler; K R Davis; M J Kaminski
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Ju H Lee; Sun U Kwon; Jae H Lee; Dae C Suh; Jong S Kim
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  Increased stroke risk predicted by compromised cerebral blood flow reactivity.

Authors:  H Yonas; H A Smith; S R Durham; S L Pentheny; D W Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study.

Authors:  R L Sacco; D E Kargman; Q Gu; M C Zamanillo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Prognosis of patients with symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis. The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.