Literature DB >> 17362594

A comparison of three diagnostic techniques for malaria: a rapid diagnostic test (NOW Malaria), PCR and microscopy.

S Gatti1, M Gramegna, Z Bisoffi, A Raglio, M Gulletta, C Klersy, A Bruno, R Maserati, S Madama, M Scaglia.   

Abstract

Malaria is a common, life-threatening infection in endemic tropical areas and one that presents a diagnostic challenge to laboratories in most non-endemic countries. A rapid and accurate diagnosis is a prerequisite for effective treatment, especially for the potentially fatal cases of Plasmodium falciparum infection. In the present, multi-centre study, the performances of a rapid diagnostic test (NOW) Malaria) and several, commercial, PCR-based assays (AMS61, AMS42, AMS43, AMS4 and AMS45) were compared against the results of microscopical examination of bloodsmears (the current 'gold standard'). The subjects were either non-European immigrants (N=135) or international travellers (N=171). There was good concordance between the results of all the detection methods, with kappa values of >0.8. Although the NOW Malaria rapid test was both sensitive (100%) and specific (100%) in detecting P. falciparum infections, it was less specific (93.1%) and sensitive (90.7%) in identifying the other Plasmodium species. The results from the AMS61 assay, designed to detect any malarial infection, generally parallelled those of the microscopy (kappa = 0.89), giving a specificity of 98.2% and a sensitivity of 91.0%. Although the use of species-specific molecular primers to identify pure infections with P. falciparum and P. vivax gave results that were in good agreement with those of the microscopy, the subjects who had apparently pure infections with P. ovale or P. malariae were always found PCR-negative. Compared with the standard microscopy, both the NOW Malaria test and the PCR-based assays were therefore poor at identifying mixed infections. The NOW Malaria test and the PCR-based assays clearly need to be improved, particularly for the correct identification of infections with Plasmodium spp. other than P. falciparum, including mixed infections. For now, expert microscopy must remain the mainstay of the laboratory diagnosis of malaria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17362594     DOI: 10.1179/136485907X156997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Trop Med Parasitol        ISSN: 0003-4983


  21 in total

1.  Detection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum by PCR primer extension and lateral flow immunoassay.

Authors:  A P H A Moers; R L Hallett; R Burrow; H D F H Schallig; C J Sutherland; A van Amerongen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Evaluation of the Immunoquick+4 malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting.

Authors:  D P J van Dijk; P Gillet; E Vlieghe; L Cnops; M Van Esbroeck; J Jacobs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Update on rapid diagnostic testing for malaria.

Authors:  Clinton K Murray; Robert A Gasser; Alan J Magill; R Scott Miller
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Use of HRP-2-based rapid diagnostic test for Plasmodium falciparum malaria: assessing accuracy and cost-effectiveness in the villages of Dielmo and Ndiop, Senegal.

Authors:  Alioune Badara Ly; Adama Tall; Robert Perry; Laurence Baril; Abdoulaye Badiane; Joseph Faye; Christophe Rogier; Aissatou Touré; Cheikh Sokhna; Jean-François Trape; Rémy Michel
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test (CareStart Malaria HRP-2/pLDH (Pf/pan) Combo Test) for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference setting.

Authors:  Jessica Maltha; Philippe Gillet; Emmanuel Bottieau; Lieselotte Cnops; Marjan van Esbroeck; Jan Jacobs
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  Diagnostic performance of rapid diagnostic tests versus blood smears for malaria in US clinical practice.

Authors:  William M Stauffer; Charles P Cartwright; Douglas A Olson; Billie Anne Juni; Charlotte M Taylor; Susan H Bowers; Kevan L Hanson; Jon E Rosenblatt; David R Boulware
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in endemic countries.

Authors:  Katharine Abba; Jonathan J Deeks; Piero Olliaro; Cho-Min Naing; Sally M Jackson; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sarah Donegan; Paul Garner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-07-06

Review 8.  Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated non-falciparum or Plasmodium vivax malaria in endemic countries.

Authors:  Katharine Abba; Amanda J Kirkham; Piero L Olliaro; Jonathan J Deeks; Sarah Donegan; Paul Garner; Yemisi Takwoingi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-18

9.  Diagnosis of Malaria Infection with or without Disease.

Authors:  Zeno Bisoffi; Federico Gobbi; Dora Buonfrate; Jef Van den Ende
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 2.576

10.  Test characteristics of the SD FK80 Plasmodium falciparum/Plasmodium vivax malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting.

Authors:  Philippe Gillet; David P J van Dijk; Emmanuel Bottieau; Lieselotte Cnops; Marjan Van Esbroeck; Jan Jacobs
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.