Literature DB >> 17361279

Estimates of the information content and dimensionality of natural scenes from proximity distributions.

Damon M Chandler1, David J Field.   

Abstract

Natural scenes, like most all natural data sets, show considerable redundancy. Although many forms of redundancy have been investigated (e.g., pixel distributions, power spectra, contour relationships, etc.), estimates of the true entropy of natural scenes have been largely considered intractable. We describe a technique for estimating the entropy and relative dimensionality of image patches based on a function we call the proximity distribution (a nearest-neighbor technique). The advantage of this function over simple statistics such as the power spectrum is that the proximity distribution is dependent on all forms of redundancy. We demonstrate that this function can be used to estimate the entropy (redundancy) of 3x3 patches of known entropy as well as 8x8 patches of Gaussian white noise, natural scenes, and noise with the same power spectrum as natural scenes. The techniques are based on assumptions regarding the intrinsic dimensionality of the data, and although the estimates depend on an extrapolation model for images larger than 3x3, we argue that this approach provides the best current estimates of the entropy and compressibility of natural-scene patches and that it provides insights into the efficiency of any coding strategy that aims to reduce redundancy. We show that the sample of 8x8 patches of natural scenes used in this study has less than half the entropy of 8x8 white noise and less than 60% of the entropy of noise with the same power spectrum. In addition, given a finite number of samples (<2(20)) drawn randomly from the space of 8x8 patches, the subspace of 8x8 natural-scene patches shows a dimensionality that depends on the sampling density and that for low densities is significantly lower dimensional than the space of 8x8 patches of white noise and noise with the same power spectrum.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17361279     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.24.000922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  7 in total

1.  Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Design of a trichromatic cone array.

Authors:  Patrick Garrigan; Charles P Ratliff; Jennifer M Klein; Peter Sterling; David H Brainard; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Natural images from the birthplace of the human eye.

Authors:  Gašper Tkačik; Patrick Garrigan; Charles Ratliff; Grega Milčinski; Jennifer M Klein; Lucia H Seyfarth; Peter Sterling; David H Brainard; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Is the preference of natural versus man-made scenes driven by bottom-up processing of the visual features of nature?

Authors:  Omid Kardan; Emre Demiralp; Michael C Hout; MaryCarol R Hunter; Hossein Karimi; Taylor Hanayik; Grigori Yourganov; John Jonides; Marc G Berman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-23

5.  The perception of naturalness correlates with low-level visual features of environmental scenes.

Authors:  Marc G Berman; Michael C Hout; Omid Kardan; MaryCarol R Hunter; Grigori Yourganov; John M Henderson; Taylor Hanayik; Hossein Karimi; John Jonides
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Edge-Orientation Entropy Predicts Preference for Diverse Types of Man-Made Images.

Authors:  Maria Grebenkina; Anselm Brachmann; Marco Bertamini; Ali Kaduhm; Christoph Redies
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Natural image coding in V1: how much use is orientation selectivity?

Authors:  Jan Eichhorn; Fabian Sinz; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.