Literature DB >> 17360989

A comparison of allografting with autografting for newly diagnosed myeloma.

Benedetto Bruno1, Marcello Rotta, Francesca Patriarca, Nicola Mordini, Bernardino Allione, Fabrizio Carnevale-Schianca, Luisa Giaccone, Roberto Sorasio, Paola Omedè, Ileana Baldi, Sara Bringhen, Massimo Massaia, Massimo Aglietta, Alessandro Levis, Andrea Gallamini, Renato Fanin, Antonio Palumbo, Rainer Storb, Giovannino Ciccone, Mario Boccadoro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this trial of the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, we compared a protocol that entailed a hematopoietic stem-cell autograft followed by an allograft from an HLA-identical sibling with a protocol of tandem autografts.
METHODS: We enrolled 162 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who were 65 years of age or younger and who had at least one sibling. All patients were initially treated with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone, followed by melphalan and autologous stem-cell rescue. Patients with an HLA-identical sibling then received nonmyeloablative total-body irradiation and stem cells from the sibling. Patients without an HLA-identical sibling received two consecutive myeloablative doses of melphalan, each of which was followed by autologous stem-cell rescue. The primary end points were overall survival and event-free survival.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 45 months (range, 21 to 90), the median overall survival and event-free survival were longer in the 80 patients with HLA-identical siblings than in the 82 patients without HLA-identical siblings (80 months vs. 54 months, P=0.01; and 35 months vs. 29 months, P=0.02, respectively). Among patients who completed their assigned treatment protocols, treatment-related mortality did not differ significantly between the double-autologous-transplant group (46 patients) and the autograft-allograft group (58 patients, P=0.09), but disease-related mortality was significantly higher in the double-autologous-transplant group (43% vs. 7%, P<0.001). The cumulative incidence rates of grades II, III, and IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) combined and of grade IV GVHD in the autograft-allograft group were 43% and 4%, respectively. Overall, 21 of 58 patients (36%) were in complete remission after a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 10 to 72) after allografting. Of the 46 patients who received two autografts, 25 (54%) died.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, survival in recipients of a hematopoietic stem-cell autograft followed by a stem-cell allograft from an HLA-identical sibling is superior to that in recipients of tandem stem-cell autografts. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00415987 [ClinicalTrials.gov].). Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17360989     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa065464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  141 in total

1.  Reduced relapse rate in upfront tandem autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation in multiple myeloma only results in borderline non-significant prolongation of progression-free but not overall survival.

Authors:  Henk M Lokhorst; Bronno van der Holt; Jan J Cornelissen; Marie José Kersten; Marinus van Oers; Reinier Raymakers; Monique C Minnema; Sonja Zweegman; Gerard Bos; Nicolaas Schaap; Shulamiet Wittebol; Okke de Weerdt; Rianne Ammerlaan; Pieter Sonneveld
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Prospective molecular monitoring of minimal residual disease after non-myeloablative allografting in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M Ladetto; S Ferrero; D Drandi; M Festuccia; F Patriarca; N Mordini; S Cena; R Benedetto; G Guarona; F Ferrando; L Brunello; P Ghione; V Boccasavia; R Fanin; P Omedè; L Giaccone; A Palumbo; R Passera; M Boccadoro; B Bruno
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Long-Term Follow-up of CALGB (Alliance) 100001: Autologous Followed by Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Transplant for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Sarah A Holstein; Vera J Suman; Kouros Owzar; Katelyn Santo; Don M Benson; Thomas C Shea; Thomas Martin; Margarida Silverman; Luis Isola; Ravi Vij; Bruce D Cheson; Charles Linker; Kenneth C Anderson; Paul G Richardson; Philip L McCarthy
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Natural killer cell lines preferentially kill clonogenic multiple myeloma cells and decrease myeloma engraftment in a bioluminescent xenograft mouse model.

Authors:  Brenna E Swift; Brent A Williams; Yoko Kosaka; Xing-Hua Wang; Jeffrey A Medin; Sowmya Viswanathan; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Armand Keating
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Clinical impact of immunophenotypic remission after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  L Giaccone; L Brunello; M Festuccia; M Gilestro; E Maffini; F Ferrando; E Talamo; R Passera; M Boccadoro; P Omedè; B Bruno
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Current approaches to the initial treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jagoda K Jasielec; Andrzej J Jakubowiak
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-02

Review 7.  Immunologic approaches for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Leo Rasche; Niels Weinhold; Gareth J Morgan; Frits van Rhee; Faith E Davies
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 12.111

8.  Multiple myeloma: biology, standard therapy, and transplant therapy.

Authors:  Morie A Gertz; Irene Ghobrial; Jean Luc-Harousseau
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Principles and overview of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Sergio Giralt; Michael R Bishop
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2009

10.  Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; Joseph R Mikhael; Francis K Buadi; David Dingli; Angela Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; Morie A Gertz; Philip R Greipp; Suzanne R Hayman; Robert A Kyle; Martha Q Lacy; John A Lust; Craig B Reeder; Vivek Roy; Stephen J Russell; Kristen E Detweiler Short; A Keith Stewart; Thomas E Witzig; Steven R Zeldenrust; Robert J Dalton; S Vincent Rajkumar; P Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.