Literature DB >> 17360454

Systematic genome instability screens in yeast and their potential relevance to cancer.

Karen W Y Yuen1, Cheryl D Warren, Ou Chen, Teresa Kwok, Phil Hieter, Forrest A Spencer.   

Abstract

To systematically identify genes that maintain genome structure, yeast knockout mutants were examined by using three assays that followed marker inheritance in different chromosomal contexts. These screens identified 130 null mutant strains exhibiting chromosome instability (CIN) phenotypes. Differences in both phenotype severity and assay specificity were observed. The results demonstrate the advantages of using complementary assays to comprehensively identify genome maintenance determinants. Genome structure was important in determining the spectrum of gene and pathway mutations causing a chromosome instability phenotype. Protein similarity identified homologues in other species, including human genes with relevance to cancer. This extensive genome instability catalog can be combined with emerging genetic interaction data from yeast to support the identification of candidate targets for therapeutic elimination of chromosomally unstable cancer cells by selective cell killing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17360454      PMCID: PMC1820685          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0610642104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  58 in total

1.  Rapid assessment of S. cerevisiae mating type by PCR.

Authors:  C Huxley; E D Green; I Dunham
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  The Hawthorne deletion twenty-five years later.

Authors:  I Herskowitz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Life cycle of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  I Herskowitz
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-12

4.  Visual assay for chromosome ploidy.

Authors:  D Koshland; P Hieter
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Mitotic stability of yeast chromosomes: a colony color assay that measures nondisjunction and chromosome loss.

Authors:  P Hieter; C Mann; M Snyder; R W Davis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Mitotic chromosome transmission fidelity mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Spencer; S L Gerring; C Connelly; P Hieter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Chromosome instability mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that are defective in microtubule-mediated processes.

Authors:  M A Hoyt; T Stearns; D Botstein
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Genetic control of chromosome stability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  O B Pashina; N T Nikolaishwili; A M Tsouladze; V L Larionov
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.239

9.  Mutational analysis of centromere DNA from chromosome VI of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J H Hegemann; J H Shero; G Cottarel; P Philippsen; P Hieter
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants.

Authors:  C Chen; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  91 in total

1.  An E3 ubiquitin ligase prevents ectopic localization of the centromeric histone H3 variant via the centromere targeting domain.

Authors:  Prerana Ranjitkar; Maximilian O Press; Xianhua Yi; Richard Baker; Michael J MacCoss; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Synthetic physical interactions map kinetochore regulators and regions sensitive to constitutive Cdc14 localization.

Authors:  Guðjón Ólafsson; Peter H Thorpe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DNA damage signalling targets the kinetochore to promote chromatin mobility.

Authors:  Jonathan Strecker; Gagan D Gupta; Wei Zhang; Mikhail Bashkurov; Marie-Claude Landry; Laurence Pelletier; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  R-loop-mediated genome instability in mRNA cleavage and polyadenylation mutants.

Authors:  Peter C Stirling; Yujia A Chan; Sean W Minaker; Maria J Aristizabal; Irene Barrett; Payal Sipahimalani; Michael S Kobor; Philip Hieter
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Chromatid cohesion defects may underlie chromosome instability in human colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Thomas D Barber; Kirk McManus; Karen W Y Yuen; Marcelo Reis; Giovanni Parmigiani; Dong Shen; Irene Barrett; Yasaman Nouhi; Forrest Spencer; Sanford Markowitz; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Christoph Lengauer; Philip Hieter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Modeling DNA trapping of anticancer therapeutic targets using missense mutations identifies dominant synthetic lethal interactions.

Authors:  Akil Hamza; Leanne Amitzi; Lina Ma; Maureen R M Driessen; Nigel J O'Neil; Philip Hieter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A matter of choice: the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion.

Authors:  Frank Uhlmann
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  A genetic screen for increased loss of heterozygosity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Marguerite P Andersen; Zara W Nelson; Elizabeth D Hetrick; Daniel E Gottschling
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Specific synthetic lethal killing of RAD54B-deficient human colorectal cancer cells by FEN1 silencing.

Authors:  Kirk J McManus; Irene J Barrett; Yasaman Nouhi; Philip Hieter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Reverse engineering of the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Andreas Doncic; Eshel Ben-Jacob; Shmuel Einav; Naama Barkai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.