Literature DB >> 1735965

Auditory distortion products measured with averaged auditory evoked potentials.

M E Chertoff1, K E Hecox, R Goldstein.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to describe the properties of averaged auditory evoked potential distortion products (AEP-DPs) in guinea pigs. This study provided a step toward developing a clinical index of nonlinear processing of auditory signals and supplied a baseline for studies evaluating the effect of cochlear damage on AEP-DPs. The amplitude of the AEP-DPs was evaluated as a function of f2/f1 ratio (1.12-1.52) and primary frequency (500 Hz-2000 Hz). The amplitude of the AEP cubic difference tone (AEP-CDT) increased with increasing f2/f1 ratio for the 500-Hz f1 primary and remained constant for the 800-Hz and 1700-Hz f1 primaries. The AEP-CDT generated by the 1100-Hz and 1400-Hz f1 primaries was maximum for the middle f2/f1 ratios (1.22, 1.32, and 1.42). The AEP-CDT could not be distinguished from the noise floor for the 2000-Hz f1 primary. The AEP difference tone (AEP-DT) was larger and more frequently identified than the AEP-CDT. The amplitude of the AEP-DT decreased with an increase in f2/f1 ratio. The decrease was more pronounced for low-frequency f1 primaries than for high-frequency f1 primaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1735965     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3501.157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  4 in total

1.  Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Efferent modulation of pre-neural and neural distortion products.

Authors:  S B Smith; K Ichiba; D S Velenovsky; B Cone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Rapid Enhancement of Subcortical Neural Responses to Sine-Wave Speech.

Authors:  Fan-Yin Cheng; Can Xu; Lisa Gold; Spencer Smith
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Differences between psychoacoustic and frequency following response measures of distortion tone level and masking.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Redwan Farooq; Louwai Muhammed; Christopher J Plack; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.