Literature DB >> 17359405

Procedural sedation for insertion of central venous catheters in children: comparison of midazolam/fentanyl with midazolam/ketamine.

Paulo Sérgio Lucas da Silva1, Simone Brasil Oliveira Iglesias, Flávia Vanesca Félix Leão, Vânia Euzébio Aguiar, Werther Brunow de Carvalho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of studies evaluating procedural sedation for insertion of central venous catheters (CVC) in pediatric patients in emergency departments or pediatric intensive care units (PICU). This study was designed to evaluate whether there is a difference in the total sedation time for CVC insertion in nonintubated children receiving two sedation regimens.
METHODS: Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either midazolam/fentanyl (M/F) or midazolam/ketamine (M/K) i.v. The Children's Hospital of Wiscosin Sedation Scale was used to score the sedation level.
RESULTS: Fifty seven patients were studied (28 M/F and 29 M/K). Group M/F received midazolam (0.24 +/- 0.11 mg.kg(-1)) and fentanyl (1.68 +/- 0.83 microg.kg(-1)) and group M/K received midazolam (0.26 +/- 0.09 mg.kg(-1)) and ketamine (1.40 +/- 0.72 mg.kg(-1)). The groups were similar in age, weight, risk classification time and sedation level. Median total sedation times for M/F and M/K were 97 vs 105 min, respectively (P = 0.67). Minor complications occurred in 3.5% (M/F) vs 20.7% (M/K) (P = 0.03). M/F promoted a greater reduction in respiratory rate (P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of nonventilated children in PICU undergoing central line placement, M/F and M/K provided a clinically comparable total sedation time. However, the M/K sedation regimen was associated with a higher rate of minor complications. A longer period of study is required to assess the efficacy and safety of these sedative agents for PICU procedures in nonintubated children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17359405     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02099.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure.

Authors:  Marija Stevic; Nina Ristic; Ivana Budic; Nebojsa Ladjevic; Branislav Trifunovic; Ivan Rakic; Marko Majstorovic; Ivana Burazor; Dusica Simic
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Pain management in newborns.

Authors:  Richard W Hall; Kanwaljeet J S Anand
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.430

3.  Ultrasound-guided vascular access in the neonatal intensive care unit: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Ignacio Oulego-Erroz; Almudena Alonso-Ojembarrena; Victoria Aldecoa-Bilbao; María Del Carmen Bravo; Jon Montero-Gato; Rocío Mosqueda-Peña; Antonio Rodríguez Nuñez
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Comparison Effect of Intravenous Ketamine with Pethidine for Analgesia and Sedation during Bone Marrow Procedures in Oncologic Children: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Babak Abdolkarimi; Soheila Zareifar; Majid Golestani Eraghi; Fazl Saleh
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res       Date:  2016-10-01

5.  Efficacy and safety of the combination of propofol and S(+)-ketamine for procedural sedation in pediatric patients undergoing totally implantable venous access port implantation: A prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Yingjun Zhang; Chaopeng Ou; Xiaohui Bai; Jielan Lai; Wan Huang; Handong Ouyang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.569

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.