Literature DB >> 17359208

Distress related to dental extraction for children under general anaesthesia and their parents.

G Gazal1, I C Mackie.   

Abstract

AIM: The aims of this study were to observe levels of distress in children and their parents before and after extractions under general anaesthesia (GA) and to assess the effect of age, gender and the number of extractions on distress.
DESIGN: a randomized comparative trial. Setting University Dental Hospital of Manchester. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and one children, together with their parents took part in this study. Immediately before GA, the Modified Child Smiley Faces Scales (MCSFS) and Modified Adult Smiley Faces Scales (MASFS) were completed by a trained observer for children and accompanying parents respectively, and again on recovery from anaesthesia and 15 minutes postoperatively.
RESULTS: There were generalised increases in mean distress scores for children when comparing the pre-operative with the postoperative scores. However, mean distress scores for parents reduced at recovery and 15 minutes postoperatively and were less than the mean distress scores for children. There was no correlation between the child and parent distress scores preoperatively, postoperatively and 15 minutes postoperatively. There were significant increase in median distress scores for younger children compared to the older children at recovery and 15 minutes postoperatively (P0.05). Children who had 8 - 14 teeth extracted demonstrated higher levels of distress than those who had 1 - 7 teeth extracted (P0.05).
CONCLUSION: Extraction of teeth under general anaesthesia does produce distress in children and their parents. Child and parental distress were not related. Both age and number of teeth extracted appear to influence the level of distress in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17359208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Dent        ISSN: 1591-996X            Impact factor:   2.231


  6 in total

1.  The experience and self-reported confidence of a group of foundation dentists in placing stainless steel crowns.

Authors:  H Imran; A Imran
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  An alternative marker for the effectiveness of water fluoridation: hospital extraction rates for dental decay, a two-region study.

Authors:  T B Elmer; J W Langford; A J Morris
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Exploring the potential value of using data on dental extractions under general anaesthesia (DGA) to monitor the impact of dental decay in children.

Authors:  A Mortimore; R Wilkinson; J H John
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 4.  Systematic Review: Predisposing, Precipitating, Perpetuating, and Present Factors Predicting Anticipatory Distress to Painful Medical Procedures in Children.

Authors:  Nicole M Racine; Rebecca R Pillai Riddell; Maria Khan; Masa Calic; Anna Taddio; Paula Tablon
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2015-09-03

5.  Comparison of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and diclofenac potassium for pain relief following dental extractions and deep cavity preparations.

Authors:  Giath Gazal; Khalid H Al-Samadani
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 6.  Effectiveness of preventive dental programs offered to mothers by non-dental professionals to control early childhood dental caries: a review.

Authors:  Ajesh George; Mariana S Sousa; Ariana C Kong; Anthony Blinkhorn; Tiffany Patterson Norrie; Jann Foster; Hannah G Dahlen; Shilpi Ajwani; Maree Johnson
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.757

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.