Literature DB >> 17357852

Mental health benefits in Employer-sponsored Health Plans, 1997-2003.

Judith L Teich1, Jeffrey A Buck.   

Abstract

Data drawn from the Mercer National Survey of Employer-sponsored Health Plans in 1997 and 2003 indicate that a large majority of employers continue to provide some level of coverage for mental health (MH) services in their primary plans. However, a majority of plans continue to impose different benefit limitations for MH than for other medical treatment. Among plans with limitations on MH coverage, there was a sharp increase in the use of limits on inpatient days and outpatient visits between 1997 and 2003. The proportion of employers providing coverage for some MH services decreased; e.g., among small employers, 88% provided coverage for inpatient MH care in 2003, compared with 94% in 1997. These results suggest that parity legislation has had a noticeable but limited effect, but that, at least in the short-term, it is unlikely that universal parity in employer-based plans will be achieved through a legislative strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17357852     DOI: 10.1007/s11414-006-9050-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1094-3412            Impact factor:   1.505


  3 in total

1.  Behavioral health benefits in employer-sponsored health plans, 1997.

Authors:  J A Buck; J L Teich; B Umland; M Stein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Design of mental health benefits: still unequal after all these years.

Authors:  Colleen L Barry; Jon R Gabel; Richard G Frank; Samantha Hawkins; Heidi H Whitmore; Jeremy D Pickreign
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Behavioral health benefits for public employees: effect of mental health parity legislation.

Authors:  P C Borzi; S Rosenbaum
Journal:  Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2001-04
  3 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Effects of mental health benefits legislation: a community guide systematic review.

Authors:  Theresa Ann Sipe; Ramona K C Finnie; John A Knopf; Shuli Qu; Jeffrey A Reynolds; Anilkrishna B Thota; Robert A Hahn; Ron Z Goetzel; Kevin D Hennessy; Lela R McKnight-Eily; Daniel P Chapman; Clinton W Anderson; Susan Azrin; Ana F Abraido-Lanza; Alan J Gelenberg; Mary E Vernon-Smiley; Donald E Nease
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Assessing healthcare expenditures of older United States adults with pain and poor versus good mental health status: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  David Rhys Axon; Jonathan Chien
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.