Literature DB >> 17357760

The validity of self-reported physical fitness test scores.

Sarah B Jones1, Joseph J Knapik, Marilyn A Sharp, Salima Darakjy, Bruce H Jones.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies often have to rely on a participant's self-reporting of information. The validity of the self-report instrument is an important consideration in any study. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the validity of self-reported Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) scores. The APFT is administered to all soldiers in the U.S. Army twice a year and consists of the maximum number of push-ups completed in 2 minutes, the maximum number of sit-ups completed in 2 minutes, and a 2-mile run for time. Army mechanics responded to a questionnaire in March and June 2004 asking them to report the exact scores of each event on their most recent APFT. Actual APFT scores were obtained from the soldier's military unit. The mean +/- standard deviation (SD) of actual and self-reported numbers of push-ups was 61 +/- 14 and 65 +/- 13, respectively. The mean +/- SD of actual and self-reported numbers of sit-ups were 66 +/- 10 and 68 +/- 10, respectively. The mean +/- SD of actual and self-reported run times (minutes) were 14.8 +/- 1.4 and 14.6 +/- 1.4, respectively. Correlations between actual and self-reported push-ups, sit-ups, and run were 0.83, 0.71, and 0.85, respectively. On average, soldiers tended to slightly over-report performance on all APFT events and individual self-reported scores could vary widely from actual scores based on Bland-Altman plots. Despite this, the close correlations between the actual and self-reported scores suggest that self-reported values are adequate for most epidemiological military studies involving larger sample sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17357760     DOI: 10.7205/milmed.172.2.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  5 in total

1.  General health status in army personnel: relations with health behaviors and psychosocial variables.

Authors:  Samuel Golenbock; Josh B Kazman; Stephen Krauss; Patricia A Deuster
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Trunk and Lower Extremity Movement Patterns, Stress Fracture Risk Factors, and Biomarkers of Bone Turnover in Military Trainees.

Authors:  Timothy C Mauntel; Stephen W Marshall; Anthony C Hackney; Brian G Pietrosimone; Kenneth L Cameron; Karen Y Peck; Jesse R Trump; Darin A Padua
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Content Validity Index and Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of a New Muscle Strength/Endurance Test Battery for Swedish Soldiers.

Authors:  Helena Larsson; Matthias Tegern; Andreas Monnier; Jörgen Skoglund; Charlotte Helander; Emelie Persson; Christer Malm; Lisbet Broman; Ulrika Aasa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Continuous metabolic monitoring based on multi-analyte biomarkers to predict exhaustion.

Authors:  Michail Kastellorizios; Diane J Burgess
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Accuracy of recall of musculoskeletal injuries in elite military personnel: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mita Lovalekar; John P Abt; Timothy C Sell; Scott M Lephart; Erin Pletcher; Kim Beals
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.