Literature DB >> 17357544

Needs, gaps and opportunities for infectious disease research in British Columbia: a perspective from population and public health.

David M Patrick1, Valencia P Remple, Perry Kendall, Robert C Brunham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A review of infectious disease research activity and capacity was performed in British Columbia and linked to a process for identifying needs, gaps and opportunities from a public health perspective.
METHODS: The study was organized in three phases: an environmental scan to describe current research activity in BC; a consultation to identify needs, gaps and opportunities with those conducting research (key informants) and the end users of research results (stakeholders); and a prioritization of the research needs emerging from the consultation.
RESULTS: Analysis and synthesis of the consultation data resulted in the identification of nine research themes, which were prioritized in the following order: efficacy and cost-benefit, disease patterns, emerging infectious disease, immunology and vaccines, disease-specific research, health promotion and communications, safe food and water, knowledge translation research and genomics. Six capacity-building themes were also identified: attraction and retention, education and training, collaboration and networks, funding, dissemination of findings, and public health input, surveillance, informatics and databases.
INTERPRETATION: The findings were helpful in developing a multi-disciplinary, multi-level infectious disease research agenda linking researchers in universities, hospitals and public health institutions with practitioners and policy-makers in British Columbia's public health system. The approach is both feasible and important to undertake at the national level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17357544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  1 in total

1.  Prioritisation of clinical research by the example of type 2 diabetes: a caregiver-survey on perceived relevance and need for evidence.

Authors:  Stefan Kamprath; Antje Timmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.