PURPOSE: To study the effects of 12C-beam of 295 keV/microm (57.24 MeV) on M5 and Chinese hamster V79 cells by using cytogenetic assays like micronuclei (MN) induction, chromosomal aberrations (CA) and apoptosis. Additionally, the relative survival of these two cell lines was tested by the colony forming ability of the cells, with a view to understanding the mechanism of cellular damages that lead to difference in cell survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Confluent cells were irradiated with 12C-beam at various doses using 15UD Pelletron accelerator. Cell survival was studied by the colony forming ability of cells. MN assay was done by fluorescent staining. Different types of chromosomal aberrations in metaphase cells were scored at 12 h after irradiation. Apoptosis was measured at different post irradiation times as detected by nuclear fragmentation and DNA ladder was prepared after 48 h of incubation. RESULTS: Dose-dependent decrease in surviving fractions was found in both the cell lines. However, the surviving fractions were higher in M5 cells in comparison to V79 cells when exposed to the same radiation doses. On the other hand, induced MN frequencies, CA frequencies and apoptosis percentages were less in M5 cells than V79 cells. Very good correlations between surviving fractions and induced MN frequencies or induced total CA or induced apoptosis percentages were obtained in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The cell strain M5 showed relatively more radio-resistance to 12C-beam compared to Chinese hamster V79 cells in this study. As the MN formation, CA and apoptosis induction were less in M5 cells as compared to parental V79 cells, the higher cell survival in the former could possibly be attributed to their better repairing ability leading to higher cell survival.
PURPOSE: To study the effects of 12C-beam of 295 keV/microm (57.24 MeV) on M5 and Chinese hamster V79 cells by using cytogenetic assays like micronuclei (MN) induction, chromosomal aberrations (CA) and apoptosis. Additionally, the relative survival of these two cell lines was tested by the colony forming ability of the cells, with a view to understanding the mechanism of cellular damages that lead to difference in cell survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Confluent cells were irradiated with 12C-beam at various doses using 15UD Pelletron accelerator. Cell survival was studied by the colony forming ability of cells. MN assay was done by fluorescent staining. Different types of chromosomal aberrations in metaphase cells were scored at 12 h after irradiation. Apoptosis was measured at different post irradiation times as detected by nuclear fragmentation and DNA ladder was prepared after 48 h of incubation. RESULTS: Dose-dependent decrease in surviving fractions was found in both the cell lines. However, the surviving fractions were higher in M5 cells in comparison to V79 cells when exposed to the same radiation doses. On the other hand, induced MN frequencies, CA frequencies and apoptosis percentages were less in M5 cells than V79 cells. Very good correlations between surviving fractions and induced MN frequencies or induced total CA or induced apoptosis percentages were obtained in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The cell strain M5 showed relatively more radio-resistance to 12C-beam compared to Chinese hamster V79 cells in this study. As the MN formation, CA and apoptosis induction were less in M5 cells as compared to parental V79 cells, the higher cell survival in the former could possibly be attributed to their better repairing ability leading to higher cell survival.
Authors: Hendrik Andreas Wolff; Steffen Hennies; Markus Karl Alfred Herrmann; Margret Rave-Fränk; David Eickelmann; Patricia Virsik; Klaus Jung; Markus Schirmer; Michael Ghadimi; Clemens Friedrich Hess; Robert Michael Hermann; Hans Christiansen Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Justin Wray; Elizabeth A Williamson; Sudha B Singh; Yuehan Wu; Christopher R Cogle; David M Weinstock; Yu Zhang; Suk-Hee Lee; Daohong Zhou; Lijian Shao; Martin Hauer-Jensen; Rupak Pathak; Virginia Klimek; Jac A Nickoloff; Robert Hromas Journal: Blood Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Rupak Pathak; Abdel Bachri; Sanchita P Ghosh; Igor Koturbash; Marjan Boerma; Regina K Binz; Jeffrey R Sawyer; Martin Hauer-Jensen Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 4.200