Literature DB >> 17357158

Predicting protein domain interactions from coevolution of conserved regions.

Maricel G Kann1, Raja Jothi, Praveen F Cherukuri, Teresa M Przytycka.   

Abstract

The knowledge of protein and domain interactions provide crucial insights into their function within a cell. Several computational methods have been proposed to detect interactions between proteins and their constitutive domains. In this work, we focus on approaches based on correlated evolution (coevolution) of sequences of interacting proteins. In this type of approach, often referred to as the mirrortree method, a high correlation of evolutionary histories of two proteins is used as an indicator to predict protein interactions. Recently, it has been observed that subtracting the underlying speciation process by separating coevolution due to common speciation divergence from that due to common function of interacting pairs greatly improves the predictive power of the mirrortree approach. In this article, we investigate possible improvements and limitations of this method. In particular, we demonstrate that the performance of the mirrortree method that can be further improved by restricting the coevolution analysis to the relatively conserved regions in the protein domain sequences (disregarding highly divergent regions). We provide a theoretical validation of our results leading to new insights into the interplay between coevolution and speciation of interacting proteins. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17357158     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  18 in total

1.  The human protein coevolution network.

Authors:  Elisabeth R M Tillier; Robert L Charlebois
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Proteomic and phylogenetic coevolution analyses of pM79 and pM92 identify interactions with RNA polymerase II and delineate the murine cytomegalovirus late transcription complex.

Authors:  Travis J Chapa; Yushen Du; Ren Sun; Dong Yu; Anthony R French
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2017-02-12       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 3.  Emerging methods in protein co-evolution.

Authors:  David de Juan; Florencio Pazos; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Knowledge-guided inference of domain-domain interactions from incomplete protein-protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Mei Liu; Xue-Wen Chen; Raja Jothi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Efficient prediction of co-complexed proteins based on coevolution.

Authors:  Damien M de Vienne; Jérôme Azé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Parallel evolution between aromatase and androgen receptor in the animal kingdom.

Authors:  Basant Tiwary; Besant K Tiwary; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Correlated evolution of interacting proteins: looking behind the mirrortree.

Authors:  Maricel G Kann; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Anna R Panchenko; Teresa M Przytycka
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Evolutionary rate covariation in meiotic proteins results from fluctuating evolutionary pressure in yeasts and mammals.

Authors:  Nathan L Clark; Eric Alani; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Exploiting amino acid composition for predicting protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Sushmita Roy; Diego Martinez; Harriett Platero; Terran Lane; Margaret Werner-Washburne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chapter 4: Protein interactions and disease.

Authors:  Mileidy W Gonzalez; Maricel G Kann
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.