Literature DB >> 17356949

Culturable leaf-associated bacteria on tomato plants and their potential as biological control agents.

Junichiro Enya1, Hirosuke Shinohara, Shigenobu Yoshida, Takao Tsukiboshi, Hiromitsu Negishi, Kazuo Suyama, Seiya Tsushima.   

Abstract

Culturable leaf-associated bacteria inhabiting a plant have been considered as promising biological control agent (BCA) candidates because they can survive on the plant. We investigated the relationship between bacterial groups of culturable leaf-associated bacteria on greenhouse- and field-grown tomato leaves and their antifungal activities against tomato diseases in vitro and in vivo. In addition, the isolated bacteria were analyzed for N-acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production, which have been reported to associate with bacterial colonization, and resistance to a tomato alkaloid (alpha-tomatine). Leaf washings and subsequent leaf macerates were used to estimate the population size of epiphytic and more internal bacteria. Bacterial population sizes on leaves at the same position increased as the leaves aged under both greenhouse and field conditions. Field-grown tomatoes had significantly larger population sizes than greenhouse-grown tomatoes. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene (rDNA) sequencing using 887 culturable leaf-associated bacteria revealed a predominance of the Bacillus and Pseudomonas culturable leaf-associated bacterial groups on greenhouse- and field-grown tomatoes, respectively. Curtobacterium and Sphingomonas were frequently recovered from both locations. From the 2138 bacterial strains tested, we selected several strains having in vitro antifungal activity against three fungal pathogens of tomato: Botrytis cinerea, Fulvia fulva, and Alternaria solani. Among bacterial strains with strong in vitro antifungal activities, Bacillus and Pantoea tended to show strong antifungal activities, whereas Curtobacterium and Sphingomonas were not effective. The results indicated the differences in antifungal activity among predominant bacterial groups. Analysis of alpha-tomatine resistance revealed that most bacterial strains in the dominant groups exhibited moderate or high resistance to alpha-tomatine in growth medium. Furthermore, some Sphingomonas and Pantoea strains showed AHL and IAA production activities. Strain 125NP12 (Pantoea ananatis) showed particular alpha-tomatine resistance, and AHL and IAA production had the highest protective value (91.7) against gray mold. Thus, the differences of these physiological properties among dominant bacteria may be associated with the disease suppression ability of BCAs on tomato plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17356949     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-006-9085-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.192


  30 in total

1.  Selective and continuous degradation of carbazole contained in petroleum oil by resting cells of Sphingomonas sp. CDH-7.

Authors:  K Kirimura; H Nakagawa; K Tsuji; K Matsuda; R Kurane; S Usami
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.043

Review 2.  Microbiology of the phyllosphere.

Authors:  Steven E Lindow; Maria T Brandl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  COLORIMETRIC ESTIMATION OF INDOLEACETIC ACID.

Authors:  S A Gordon; R P Weber
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Heterogeneous transcription of an indoleacetic acid biosynthetic gene in Erwinia herbicola on plant surfaces.

Authors:  M T Brandl; B Quiñones; S E Lindow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Bacteria in the leaf ecosystem with emphasis on Pseudomonas syringae-a pathogen, ice nucleus, and epiphyte.

Authors:  S S Hirano; C D Upper
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Purification and characterization of beta 2-tomatinase, an enzyme involved in the degradation of alpha-tomatine and isolation of the gene encoding beta 2-tomatinase from Septoria lycopersici.

Authors:  R W Sandrock; D DellaPenna; H D VanEtten
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Comparisons of single versus multiple bacterial species on biological control of anthurium blight.

Authors:  R Fukui; H Fukui; A M Alvarez
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Bacterial populations associated with rice seed in the tropical environment.

Authors:  B Cottyn; E Regalado; B Lanoot; M De Cleene; T W Mew; J Swings
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Comparative dynamics of adherent and nonadherent bacterial populations on maize leaves.

Authors:  Gwyn A Beattie; Lise M Marcell
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  A saponin-detoxifying enzyme mediates suppression of plant defences.

Authors:  K Bouarab; R Melton; J Peart; D Baulcombe; A Osbourn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  36 in total

1.  Culturable bacterial communities on leaf sheaths and panicles of rice plants in Japan.

Authors:  Hirosuke Shinohara; Shigenobu Yoshida; Junichiro Enya; Yuriko Watanabe; Takao Tsukiboshi; Hiromitsu Negishi; Seiya Tsushima
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Leaf microbiota in an agroecosystem: spatiotemporal variation in bacterial community composition on field-grown lettuce.

Authors:  Gurdeep Rastogi; Adrian Sbodio; Jan J Tech; Trevor V Suslow; Gitta L Coaker; Johan H J Leveau
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Microbial and Functional Diversity within the Phyllosphere of Espeletia Species in an Andean High-Mountain Ecosystem.

Authors:  Carlos A Ruiz-Pérez; Silvia Restrepo; María Mercedes Zambrano
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Specificity of Pseudomonas isolates on healthy and Fusarium head blight-infected spikelets of wheat heads.

Authors:  Shigenobu Yoshida; Atsushi Ohba; Yin-Mei Liang; Motoo Koitabashi; Seiya Tsushima
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Diversity of bacterial community in freshwater of Woopo wetland.

Authors:  Keun Sik Baik; Seong Chan Park; Eun Mi Kim; Kyung Sook Bae; Jae-Hyung Ahn; Jong-Ok Ka; Jongsik Chun; Chi Nam Seong
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.422

6.  Exposure to bioaerosols during the growth season of tomatoes in an organic greenhouse using Supresivit (Trichoderma harzianum) and Mycostop (Streptomyces griseoviridis).

Authors:  Vinni Mona Hansen; Anne Winding; Anne Mette Madsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds?

Authors:  Jonathan A Cray; Andrew N W Bell; Prashanth Bhaganna; Allen Y Mswaka; David J Timson; John E Hallsworth
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.813

8.  Bacterial community compositions of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) seeds and plant growth promoting activity of ACC deaminase producing Bacillus subtilis (HYT-12-1) on tomato seedlings.

Authors:  Mingshuang Xu; Jiping Sheng; Lin Chen; Yejun Men; Lin Gan; Shuntang Guo; Lin Shen
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Defining the Core Citrus Leaf- and Root-Associated Microbiota: Factors Associated with Community Structure and Implications for Managing Huanglongbing (Citrus Greening) Disease.

Authors:  Ryan A Blaustein; Graciela L Lorca; Julie L Meyer; Claudio F Gonzalez; Max Teplitski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Distortion of trichome morphology by the hairless mutation of tomato affects leaf surface chemistry.

Authors:  Jin-Ho Kang; Feng Shi; A Daniel Jones; M David Marks; Gregg A Howe
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.