Literature DB >> 17356372

Aesthetics in oral implantology: biological, clinical, surgical, and prosthetic aspects.

Gilberto Sammartino1, Gaetano Marenzi, Alessandro Espedito di Lauro, Guerino Paolantoni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify a correct clinical, surgical, and prosthetic management of endosseous implants replacing missing teeth in the anterior maxilla, achieving predictable aesthetic outcomes. Placement of immediate post-extraction implants without incisions or flap elevation is one of the surgical treatment options able to improve the healing and regenerative potentials of the fresh socket. MATERIALS: Fifty-five patients (33 men, 22 women), ranging in age from 19 to 57 years (mean 29), were selected for this study. All the patients were not smokers, no bruxers, presented stable soft tissue conditions, an acceptable occlusion, and the absence of pathologies that would contraindicate bone healing. Patients were treated with implants made by 2 manufacturers: Institute Straumann, Walderburg, Switzerland and Friadent, Mannheim, Germany. A total of 87 implants were placed immediately after each failing tooth had been removed. The temporary restoration was placed 3 months after implant placement, and the final restoration was placed 4 months from the surgical procedure. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at implant placement, and 2, 4, 18, and 24 months post-insertion.
RESULTS: At 24 months, only 3 implants were lost (2 in male patients;1 in female patient). All of these failed implants did not achieve osseointegration. The overall success rate was 96.6%, with an implant failure rate of 3.4%, all prior to restoration.
CONCLUSIONS: The immediate placement in the anterior maxilla fresh extraction sockets without incisions or flaps elevation is a surgical option that can ensure ideal peri-implant tissues healing, preserving the presurgical gingival and bone aspects. For a predictable aesthetic result, the most important aspect seems to be the height and thickness of the buccal bone wall, which remain after immediate placement of the fixture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17356372     DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3180327821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  5 in total

1.  A Comparative Study of Clinical Parameters in Submerged and Non submerged Implants.

Authors:  Parviz Torkzaban; Seyed Reza Arabi; Ghodratollah Roshanaei; Mohsen Rostami; Sara Soheilifar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-03-01

2.  Immediate loading of implants in the aesthetic zone: comparison between two placement timings.

Authors:  Fabrizio Carini; Salvatore Longoni; Valeria Pisapia; Manuel Francesconi; Vito Saggese; Gianluca Porcaro
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-10-25

3.  Postextraction implant placement with immediate provisionalisation and finalisation, using a simplified technique: technical notes and a case report.

Authors:  Rudy Scala; Paolo Ghensi; Alessandro Cucchi; Enrico Pistoia
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2012-10-05

4.  Forced eruption and implant site development in the aesthetic zone: A case report.

Authors:  Huseyin Gencay Keceli; Mustafa Baris Guncu; Zeynep Atalay; Mustafa Serdar Evginer
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-04

5.  The influence of dental experience on a dental implant navigation system.

Authors:  Ting-Mao Sun; Huey-Er Lee; Ting-Hsun Lan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.757

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.